Commons:Valued image candidates

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.

Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
replace the review parameter with

|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}

Save the page.
There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
- If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
- If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:

You type	You get	When
`*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~`	Comment My comment. -- Example	You have a comment.
`*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~`	Info My information. -- Example	You have information.
`*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~`	Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example	You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
`*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~`	Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example	You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
`*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~`	Question My question. -- Example	You have a question.
`*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~`	Support Reason for supporting. -- Example	You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.

If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.

Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.

Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
- status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
- status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
- status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
- status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).

Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

54,431 closed valued image candidates
Closed as		Nominations
Promoted	48,911 (89.9%)
Undecided	3,037 (5.6%)
Declined	2,483 (4.6%)

New valued image nominations[edit]

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Martinvl (talk) on 2024-03-12 15:50 (UTC)
Scope: Vertical sundials in South Africa
Reason: Unlike the Northern Hemisphere, the numbers on vertical sundials in the Southern Hemisphere follow a clockwise pattern. I believe that this is the best image in Commons of a vertical sundial, not only in South Africa, but in the Southern Hemisphere. The cropped version of this image has been used in many articles on sundials. -- Martinvl (talk)
Previous reviews
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-13 08:39 (UTC)
Scope: The intersection of Shevchenko and Zoriana streets in the village of Mankivka
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-14 06:25 (UTC)
Scope: Hemicycla fritschi, shell
Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-14 08:11 (UTC)
Scope: Entrance to the village of Ivanky
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Not valuable enough for a scope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-14 10:29 (UTC)
Scope: 50 Pfennig Notgeld banknote (1921) of Treuenbrietzen by Heinz Schiestl, reverse: Prince-elector Ludwig I.
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-14 10:29 (UTC)
Scope: Fischers Maathes reclining on his sofa.
Comment Useful and a good nominee, but I think "before 1879" is superfluous because since that's the year he died, it's obvious. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-15 05:36 (UTC)
Scope: Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Herakles after the type of 'Lansdowne'
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-15 05:34 (UTC)
Scope: Ourapteryx sambucaria specimens – male dorsal
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-03-15 05:54 (UTC)
Scope: Mural above main entrance of the Reformierte Kirche Vnà South side.
Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose The paintwork (not really a mural) appears contemporary. I don't see this as valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-15 07:11 (UTC)
Scope: Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), right valve
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-15 08:17 (UTC)
Scope: Sign "I love Volodarka"
Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: grendel\|khan on 2024-03-15 11:29 (UTC)
Scope: Human pregnancy test, daily series
Used in: en:Pregnancy test, en:Human chorionic gonadotropin
Comment Scope must be linked to correct category of similar images. Might also suggest scope be made a little more specific, say, "Human pregancy test, daily series". --GRDN711 (talk) 17:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done There is no category for "human pregnancy test", but I've updated it to link to the appropriate category, and specified "daily series". Thanks for the heads-up! grendel\|khan 02:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support useful and used. Scopes need to have a linked scope category but the actual wording of the scope does not have to match the linked scope category name. In this case, the scope category - Category:Pregnancy test, is a sub-category of parent Category:Human pregnancy, so there is an implicit connection. Less you think pregnancy tests should not be explicitly categorized, try googling "pet pregnancy tests" :). --GRDN711 (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Adjusted the name of the scope accordingly, linking to the same category, thank you! grendel\|khan 04:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-03-15 11:49 (UTC)
Scope: Oranda (ship, 2005), stern
Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose Sorry - IMO this one or this one, better show the stern area of this European inland cargo barge, with better exposure and less background clutter. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-03-15 16:49 (UTC)
Scope: Reformierte Kirche Scuol Tower entrance.
Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose If this door had historical value, they would not have inserted a modern lock. Looks recent. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-15 18:42 (UTC)
Scope: Honda Tomo - left rear view
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-15 18:44 (UTC)
Scope: Mole Costruzione Artigianale 001 - left rear view
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose too dark. cannot see enough detail. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Soft focus set Softfocus set to 0 Softfocus set to 1 Softfocus set to 2
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: grendel\|khan on 2024-03-15
Description: A set of images taken in identical conditions except that the soft focus setting on the lens (a Canon EF 135mm f/2.8 with Softfocus) is changed, to clearly present the setting's effect.
VISC of: Soft focus photography
We do not have set nominations these days. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-16 05:58 (UTC)
Scope: Madonna con Bambino Jacobello Del Fiore - Museo Correr
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-16 06:01 (UTC)
Scope: Composition with Winged Nymph Blowing Amongst Reeds by Alexandre de Riquer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-16 06:04 (UTC)
Scope: Ourapteryx sambucaria – mounted specimen male ventral
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-16 06:23 (UTC)
Scope: Laevichlamys squamosa (Squamose Scallop), left valve
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-03-16 07:00 (UTC)
Scope: Aerial view of Lingampalli railway station
Comment The scope must be as concise as possible: take inspiration from the scopes that you can see in the competition. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done @Archaeodontosaurus: --iMahesh (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Ok now ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-16 09:04 (UTC)
Scope: Entrance to the village of Kashperivka
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose I don't see this as being valuable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-03-16 18:20 (UTC)
Scope: Detail of the main entrance of the Reformierte Kirche Zernez
Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose This does not appear to be valuable. I don't think the whole door /doorway would either. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-16 18:24 (UTC)
Scope: Statue of Saint Peter in Trier-Ehrang, Germany.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-16 18:22 (UTC)
Scope: Former stairway to "Pfeiffersbrücke" in Trier-Ehrang, Germany.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-16 21:33 (UTC)
Scope: Blankenheimer Kreuz in Trier-Ehrang, Germany (after restoration).
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-17 05:22 (UTC)
Scope: Roman antiquities in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Venice) - Statuette of a boar
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-17 05:38 (UTC)
Scope: Female Figure with a Glass by Alexandre de Riquer - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Link is incorrect. Also, looks like she is holding some sort of chemical/laboratory flask (not a glass) which presumably has an allegorical explanation. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] We cannot discuss the official titles of the paintings.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-17 05:27 (UTC)
Scope: Roman antiquities in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Venice) - Cameo with Zeus Egioco
Question Tried to find out out what egioco means. No luck. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Very practical: Wikipedia... https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egida or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-17 06:17 (UTC)
Scope: Canariella discobolus, shell
Support useful image of a rare species. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-03-17 10:36 (UTC)
Scope: L'Eldorado - Péniche évènementielle (Lambersart), bow and starboard view.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Oppose IMO there are problems with this nomination. Per COM:VICR (6) and Category:Ships, the categorization needs to be improved. Per COM:VICR (3), image is cluttered and too dark. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-03-17 12:41 (UTC)
Scope: Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight
please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-03-17 12:49 (UTC)
Scope: Stachyris nigriceps (Grey-throated babbler) - Sub. Sp.- S.n.nigriceps
Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-03-18 02:37 (UTC)
Scope: Andrea - IMO 7041431
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-18 05:55 (UTC)
Scope: Gauls associated with the Lesser Attalid Dedication (Venice) - Kneeling Gaul
Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-18 05:56 (UTC)
Scope: Paintings of Madonna lactans by Dieric Bouts - Museo Correr
Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-18 06:29 (UTC)
Scope: Hemicycla distensa, shell, banded form
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-03-18 10:56 (UTC)
Scope: Laléa - Péniche évènementielle (Wambrechies), bow and starboard view.
Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2024-03-18 22:44 (UTC)
Scope: Fantasia (ship, 1951), bow view.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-19 06:03 (UTC)
Scope: Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Head of Athena of parthenos type of Phidias
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-19 06:04 (UTC)
Scope: Ourapteryx sambucaria specimens - female dorsal
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-19 06:08 (UTC)
Scope: Philip II in armor copy from Titian by Mariano Fortuny y Madrazo - Fortuny Museum
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-03-19 06:22 (UTC)
Scope: Scaeochlamys livida (Livid Scallop), right valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-19 09:15 (UTC)
Scope: Ascension Church in the village of Sytkivtsi (1826)
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
Scope: Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico) (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))
Previous reviews Comment Good image, good caption, but the scope is too imprecise (it can be improved) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] @Archaeodontosaurus: Done the scope has changed--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)`[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope: Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México (Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
Reason: The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
Comment There is already an image promoted in VI: you have to go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach
Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach
Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Gzen92 ^[discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)`[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Comment The light on the cble is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] Support The cable is distracing in the current VI too. The people are distracing here, but light and crop are superior. --Milseburg (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 09:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Commons:Valued image candidates

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Renomination[edit]

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Review procedure[edit]

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

Contents

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

New valued image nominations[edit]

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Navigation menu

Commons:Valued image candidates

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Renomination[edit]

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Review procedure[edit]

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

New valued image nominations[edit]

Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Navigation menu

Search