User talk:Bogomolov.PL

Welcome to the Commons, Bogomolov.PL!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Arhangay_sums.png[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 13:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected this with the proper tag. Bogomolov created this image. Rarelibra 17:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolia location map[edit]

I think it's quite unfriendly to overwrite my map of Mongolia without telling me anything and especially when there is no need for it. I would prefer you revert your edit and upload your image with another name. --NNW (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arhangay_sums.png[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Arhangay_sums.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Latebird (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mongolia, Sukhbaatar Mormon's temple.JPG[edit]

Please note that this file is named incorrectly, as the building depicted is a meetinghouse, which is the term Mormons use for the building where local congregations meet for weekly worship services. A meetinghouse differs from a temple, which is reserved for special forms of worship. There currently is not a temple in Mongolia - see List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for a complete list of the (currently 128) temples in operation worldwide. -- 208.81.184.4 15:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Bogomolov.PL!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Khyargas-Nuur lake, Uvs aimag, Mongolia.JPG is uncategorized since 28 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Khar-Nuur lake, Khovd aimag, Mongolia.JPG is uncategorized since 28 February 2009. BotMultichillT 05:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Воеводства Польши.png was uncategorized on 16 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Red Georgievskaya Lenta.jpg was uncategorized on 28 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Yabloko Party meeting at Moscow, 2012-01-14 5.JPG was uncategorized on 14 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Betula spp.[edit]

Hi Bogomolov - Betula rezniczenkoana is a synonym of Betula microphylla. See also e.g. here. The EPPO document you cite is not supported by other botanists. As an aside, very nice photos, thanks for adding them! - MPF (talk) 10:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll do what I can, but images are often not easy to find (particularly as a lot of the time I am using textbook references, not internet sources). Excellent that you are adding photos of Mongolian flora, as it is still an area that is poorly covered in Commons. Would you be able to get photos of Picea obovata, or even better, of Abies sibirica? As you can see, there are no photos at all of natural trees of the latter! - MPF (talk) 11:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Granica Rzeszy[edit]

Dzięki, poprawiałem parokrotnie te obrazki - umknęło mojej uwadze, przy okazji skoryguję, serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PNG 24 bity?[edit]

Witam bardzo serdecznie, te 24 a nie np. 8 bitów wynika stąd, że tak mam ustawione programy graficzne służące do innych celów, przy okazji coś tam "spłodzę" dla Wiki - w ramach relaksu. Ale myślę, że problem nie leży głównie w kolorze a w rozdzielczości. Przy eksporcie map bitowych korzystam z rozdzielczości 300 dpi, taka jest mi potrzebna "na styku" grafika wektorowa-grafika rastrowa (do tych innych celów). Np eksport w rozdzielczości 150 dpi, zmniejsza wielkość pliku w porównaniu z 300 dpi, o prawie 4/5 (to nie jest zależność liniowa). A tak naprawdę jestem starym człowiekiem, muszę zadbać o oczy i pora kończyć ze ślęczeniem przed ekranem (vide: odcień czerwonego w znanych rysunkach - już poprawione!). I drugie pytanie - rysując File:1puk_3_2.png korzystałem z mapy tamtego regionu, dzisiaj nie potrafię odpowiedzieć, z której i jak powinno być poprawnie. Przyjąłem, może ze zbytnim zaufaniem, że mapa jest poprawna. Ludzką rzeczą jest popełniać ... Serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 16:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zostałem źle zrozumiany, ja tylko chciałem się usprawiedliwić, wspólnie tworzymy Wikipedię, jeśli można coś usprawnić - to proszę bardzo! Serdeczności --lonio17 (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Załadowałem nową wersję pliku File:1puk 3 1.png (8. bitową), czy ten się szybciej ładuje? Poprawki merytoryczne bardzo cenne - dzięki. Proszę ewentualnie samemu ładować 32 → 8, byleby pozostało moje autorstwo rysunku (mapki) i nie traciły się kolory. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --lonio17 (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oczywiście chodziło o 24 → 8 :)) lonio17 (talk) 08:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Już tego nie poprawię: File:Polozenie 17 09 1939.png, zniszczył mi się podkład a nowego nie będę rysował, zbyt dużo pracy. Nie wiem co napisać w deskrypcji, ale nie może być tak, że ktoś zmniejsza ilość kolorów w nie swoim rysunku i staje się jego autorem. Czego? Ilości kolorów? Mechanicznej zmiany? Mnie te 24 bity nie przeszkadzają i jak dotychczas nikt nie zgłaszał takiego problemu. Pozdrawiam--lonio17 (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I tak: File:Armia krajowa 1.png jest OK! Pozdrawiam lonio17 (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File correction[edit]

Hello. Please, correct file Russia_Moscow_oblast_locator_map.svg mistake: Sheremetievo airport is a part of the Moscow Oblastj and it isn't a part of Moscow city. Moscow's mayor Luzhkov in 1995 illegally declared the airport a city territory.

Население Азербайджана[edit]

Добрый вечер. Ваш последний график намного лучше оформлен чем мой вариант, но несколько неточен. Население Азербайджана на конец 2009 года не достигает 9 миллионов. 1 Да и разница в 91-92гг почти в 150 тысяч человек не видна.--Prater (talk) 19:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Она и не достигает, та цифра, на которую ссылаетесь Вы (8896.9) - на начало года, вот цифра на конец 2009 года (напомню, что в описании файла указано, что данные на конец года)8 997.4 - куда уж ближе к 9 млн?

Теперь о разнице в 150 тыс в 1991-1992 гг.: в конце 1991 г. было по офиц цифрам 7324 тыс., а по данным Бюро цензов (пересчитанным мною на конец года, ибо исходно они на середину года) 7409 тыс., т.е. разница 85 тысяч, аналогично для конца 1990 года офиц. 7218,5, по амер. дан. 7279,5, т.е. разница всего 61 тыс.

Иными словами, если правильно отследить то, к какой дате (начало, середина или конец года) относятся те или иные цифры - все немного иначе (точнее). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

belarus[edit]

Hello. I saw your map [1] , and was wondering if you could give me a link that has the official data? Could you give me it? (Lilic (talk) 07:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Thanks. You too. Tell me also, does the site have a map that says what which polygon is? I'm not so good with russian... serbian unfortunately isn't close enough :P and I'm a bit busy before I can go to that. I was hoping to make an ethnic map of belarus according to the smallest units. :)

Also, a suggestion on the proportional circle map... when I had cartography at my uni. the professor said that the units should be rounded off to nice numbers. So, for example, 20,000 instead of 20,456. Just a suggestion on how to perhaps improve it. :) (Lilic (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

I'll see if I can find a map that I once made. It had these proportional circles. I just dunno if I still have it - but the way it was made might interest you.

Do you think you can make an ethnic map of all the groups in belarus? I suspect that the belarussians are not a majority everywhere... but I dunno. (Lilic (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Could you make an ethnic map of belarus for more than just poles? - something like this : [2] - I think there are not that many groups - but perhaps it might be possible for you to make such a map for belarus? I think it would look interesting.

Here's what I was talking about - just something to keep in mind - maybe it might be useful for the future. [3] [4] [5] Notice how in the legend the numbers are rounded off. (Lilic (talk) 23:01, 31 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. Been having computer problems.

The reason why the legend has cut off intervals is because it is a legend. It is not supposed to show exact numbers - just like 30-50% category does not show every value. Here's a similar example... I made a density map - [6] - and I got points taken off because the legend did not have exact numbers. Circle size should have been some even number, like say 2000 or 4000.

I have an ethnic map of belarus. I'll see if I can upload it - it's on my wall, so I probably have to take a picture. But there is for example this map - [7] I suspect that it was drawn by settlements, or some approximation of settlements. Same for this map - [8] . But I don't think that there are such small census areas? See this map of romania - [9] there are these very small units. Does belarus have such very small units? (Lilic (talk) 05:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Изображение даурской пищухи[edit]

Ваш файл с фотографией Ochotona dauurica - это точно не она. Скорее всего Ochotona alpina changaica. Но хотел бы уточнить на какой высоте снято, и какой биотоп. Тариатов в Монголии несколько. Ваш Тариат рядом с Терхиин -Цагаан -нур? С уважением, Zorog (talk) 09:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я, помнится, когда загружал изображение думал, что это даурика, но потом (а этого зверька через час подстрелили) по ДНК зверь был определен как альпина. Так что его надо переименовать, естественно, и поудалять из статей.

Тариат в Монголии один. И он там, где он есть - рядом с Тэрхийн-Цагаан-Нууром. Зверек жил в лаве вдоль левого (северного) берега речки (Суман-Гол кажется), вытекающей из озера, в 1 км ниже деревянного моста через речку (по нему туристы ездят к вулкану и к турбазам на северном берегу озера, на нем взимают плату за проезд в нацпарк). Координаты 48 гр 10' 14" N 99 гр 53' 58" E. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, точно алтайская. Я там бывал. Переношу обсуждение на страницу алтайской пищухи. Encarta выдает 2 Тариата в Монголии, второй на ТОле у Лун сомона.Zorog (talk) 19:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Tuva.svg[edit]

Hello,

you have reverted my changes of File:Coat of arms of Tuva.svg because of the wrong colors. Can you tell me what the correct colors are?

I want to reupload my file (with the correct colors) because of the better details i have worked out.--MS05L (talk) 13:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Color and brightness correction[edit]

Добрый день. Позволю себе заметить, что после вашей последней волны коррекции при взгляде на некоторые портреты возникает ощущение, что для них позировали покойники - настолько мертвенно бледными и неестественными стала их расцветка (напр. File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (XVIII).jpg, File:Hieranim Chadkievič. Геранім Хадкевіч.jpg). Вам так не кажется? И еще: какой, собственно, смысл изменять естественные цвета вполне себе качественно сделанных репродукций? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Приведенные картины после коррекции, действительно, выглядят лучше и естественнее. Однако насчет портретов я не могу согласиться. Дело в том, что при "отбеливании" местами проступил оттенок довольно близкий к синему (см. приведенные примеры), а такого все-таки не могло быть. На досуге, если вы не возражаете, я постараюсь провести более мягкую коррекцию. В целом, конечно, замечание про исходный цвет лиц вполне резонно, но я не осведомлен, насколько приветствуется такое искусственное омолаживание? И есть ли какие-нибудь авторитетные нормы, критерии, ориентиры? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Само по себе улучшение качества, бесспорно, можно только приветствовать. Но все же наш случай несколько иной: здесь дефекты качества неявные, я бы сказал даже спорные. Над приведенным фото, действительно, пришлось поработать, но все дело в некачественном исходнике (текстура, муар + плохое разрешение). Будь у меня хорошая копия снимка, ничего бы не пришлось менять. Данную дискуссию я начал в первую очередь потому, что на мой вгляд, некоторые портреты стали хуже с точки зрения эстетического восприятия. Возможно (но не точно), они терерь выглядят более достоверно, но в то же время в некоторых случаях заметнее стали дефекты холста-покрытия (напр. File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg + само по себе неотреставрированное полотно с "отреставрированной" гаммой выгляд несколько странно), где-то появилась не совсем естественные оттенки (гамма-коррекция проводится равномерно по всему изображению, но ведь разные цвета имеют разную склонность к "старению", поэтому их реставрация совсем не простой процесс). К тому же, правильная подача той или иной работы (в т.ч. при правильном свете) порой довольно важный фактор экспозиции. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Что касается портрета Я. Радзивилла, то приведенная версия уже имеется в File:Janusz Radziwiłł (1612–1655).jpg (самая первая) и на мой взгляд, она как результат сканирования репродукции из альбома не представляет особого интереса. По поводу коррекции, то в пользу своей позиции могу попытаться привести примеры различных глянцевых каталогов (зачастую их издают учреждения, которые трудно упрекнуть в неавторитетности) и в таких альбомах подается наиболее благоприятное для восприятия картины освещение (т.е. разные затертости не выпячиваются, как и не производится отбеливание лиц). Например, тот же портерт File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg взят с официального сайта Национально художественного музея Беларуси и я не думаю, что его обработка произведена не профессионально (не авторитетно для википедии). Вот, кстати, их коррекция портрета Януша Радзивилла, на мой вгляд более удачная. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я понимаю вашу позицию, но тем не менее она мне кажется не достаточно обоснованной с научной точки зрения. В первую очередь меня смущает тот факт, что степень "отбеливания" для каждого портрета выбирается, скажем так, на глаз. А ведь нередко никаких ориентиров (кроме разве что очень даже спорного эталона "белизны" лиц) просто нет. Просто посмотрите на недавно отреставрированный портрет File:Jakub Kuncevič. Якуб Кунцэвіч.jpg [10]: на нем есть белые краски (т.е. искажения цветовой гаммы отсутствует), но в то же время лицо у пана Кунцевича вполне себе "загорелое". Не думаю, что Национальный научно-исследовательский реставрационный центр Украины провел данную работу некомпенентно. Опять таки на исходнике File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg белый цвет также вполне себе присутствует (пускай и не совсем белоснежный, но где обоснование, что он был белоснежным?), и в данном случае я категорически против изменений как явного ухудшения представления работы. Мне думается, для того, чтобы брать на себя полномочия исправлять реставраторов (как собственно, и реставрировать портреты), необходимо обладать соответствующей компетенцией и подробно обосновывать каждое изменение. Приведенные мною примеры, на мой взгляд, ставят под сомнение обоснованность принятых решений. Не подумайте, я не говорю, что все плохо: например, File:Barbara Radzivił (Zaviša). Барбара Радзівіл (Завіша).jpg, File:Stanisłaŭ Kazimier Radzivił. Станіслаў Казімер Радзівіл.JPG и File:Krystyna Jaŭchimija Radzivił. Крыстына Яўхімія Радзівіл.jpg вполне удачны, но в некоторых случаях я предлагаю все же быть менее радикальным. Не стот забывать, что это это не просто "снимки" быта, но еще произведения искусства и памятники старины, которые требуют уважительного отношения. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Очень интересно. Не подскажите, в каком графическом редакторе можно производить подобные манипуляции с гистограммой? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:59, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Попробовал в привычном фотошопе убрать пустые края гистограммы по каждому каналу (правда, предел там приходится контролировать на глаз), вот результат [11]. На мой взгляд, как-то посимпатичнее нынешнего варианта. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 23:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению, мне не совсем понятно ваше пояснение. В фотошопе я использую Levels (Image -> Adjustments). Все, что там воможно, это для каждого канала убрать из динамичесого диапазона (ДД) неиспользуемые бины. Качество изображения, при этом, бесспорно, улучшается, т.к. ДД используется более рационально. Можно еще изменить значение центрального (128-го) бина, но я этим не пользовался (оно автоматически устанавливается по центру нового ДД), т.к. здесь любое решение может быть спорным и привести к потере информации. Да, еще при регулировке ДД я зажимаю Alt и слежу за появлением на изображении значений пикселов, соответствующих первым с левого (от 0) и с правого края (от 256) бинов. Правильно ли я понял, вы не против загрузки моего варианта? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Очень приятно, что мы пришли к взаимопониманию. По поводу гистограммы области: действительно, можно сделать так, как вы предлагаете. Но в этом случае следует очень аккуратно эту область выделить, иначе в процессе изменения ДД могут проявиться новые контура (ее границы). Что касается нелинейных преобразований, то это действительно, несколько субъективно (в т.ч. вследствие свойств конкретного монитора), поэтому если для какой-либо работы появляются разногласия, то думаю, лучше в этом случае свести нелинейное воздействие к минимуму. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZaisanmemorialUBmongolia.jpg[edit]

Photo usage[edit]

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ochotona_dauurica,_Tariat_sum,_Arkhangai_province,_Mongolia_extr.JPG

And I attributed the picture like this: Bogomolov.PL with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Bogomolov.PL and also added a link to the license: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:public_domain

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 06:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Plik:Posiedzenie WRB i CBRW.jpg[edit]

Witam. Moim zdaniem po Twoim przefiltrowaniu jakość grafiki spadła. Zwróć uwagę na jasny komin z tle. Wcześniej jasność zmieniała się subtelnie, teraz skokowo. Nie wiem też, po co zmniejszasz rozdzielczość zdjęć. Specjalnie skanuję je w jak najwyższej. Usuwanie mory jest zbędne, bo kiedy Wikipedia automatycznie zmniejsza fotkę, mora znika. Bladyniec (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Partisans in Slovenia

Affected:

File:Mehdi-Huseynzade.jpg

Yours sincerely Eleassar ^(t/p) 23:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postcard BNR.jpg[edit]

Доброго здоровья! После цветокоррекции картинка стала ярче (чётче). Однако, рисунок потерял "теплоту". Может немного баланс сдвинуть от голубого к жёлтому? Агалогично с картинкой File:Postcard of BNR.jpg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 14:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я профессионально занимаюсь дизайном в полиграфии, поэтому у меня цвета показывают достаточно точно. Но я не люблю вмешиваться в чужую работу, поэтому оставляю на Ваше усмотрение. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Белый цвет можно и не трогать, а остальное сдвинуть к жёлтому. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я бы предпочел оригинал не трогать, как аутентичный материал (это важно историкам, исследователям)и даже может сделать откат. А с убранным фоном (раз он не нравится) загрузить отдельный файл -- File:Postcard_BNR_Herb-VKL.png. Возможно белорусский текст стоит согласовать с русским в описании файла (я белорусский плохо знаю). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вот вариант с фоном (перезалил). --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yezidi women in Tbilisi.jpg[edit]

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание![edit]

на описание файлов. Я так понимаю, вас в 1901 году не было, 2012 - не 1901 и это не Ваша работа, как и авторство). --Vizu (talk) 01:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TsedenbalOfficial.jpg[edit]

Re: File:Phrynocephalus versicolor distribution.png[edit]

Hi Bogomolov.PL

I'm not exactly sure if I understood you: Yes, you're right, the map is based on IUCN's spatial data; The Reptile Database (usually more precise and up-to-date) includes also parts of Russia as range of P. versicolor. But what are the advantages of jpeg? The used colour space is rather small, so the lossy compression would lead to more blurry files without a real benefit. svg would be great, but the export filter of QGIS is rotten...

Greetings, Rbrausse (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RDB (imo an authoritative source for reptiles) lists a larger range, but take a look at the paragraph "Comment": The taxonomy of this species is controversially discussed. The data quality of IUCN is sometimes (often?) not the best (just count the red question marks :)), but they released shape files with a usable license. My maps are not nice, but (according to one of the herpetology guys at fr.WP) good enough. The data source I use is clearly stated on the description page: Just remove the map if IUCN is out-dated or incorrect - I don't mind, really ;)

jpeg as format has two issues:

I'm lazy as hell: QGIS supports only png and converting would be one step more
I loathe compression artefacts

sooner or later I will take a look at the dozen or so available svg plug-ins for QGIS - range and borders as vectors are the way to create maps and will greatly improve the post-processing.

cheers, Rbrausse (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

regarding png/jpeg: I think we can agree that we disagree...

as a full disclosure: Personally I'm not a biologist, playing around with geoinformation systems is fun and the French herpetology project liked my maps. IUCN distribution data includes often not the newest research results, but is at the moment the fastest way to create (mostly) reliable range maps.

Rbrausse (talk) 21:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS both RDB (Peter Uetz as maintainer will reply) and IUCN (will be forwarded to Philip Bowles, Chair of the Snake and Lizard Red List Authority) welcome corrections and annotations, especially Peter is really responsive Rbrausse (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

last time assessed in 2008... no wonder your corrections aren't included, unfortunately IUCN is underfunded AND bureaucratic. All the best for your report, Rbrausse (talk) 22:51, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Moscow (13 January 2013)[edit]

Просто хотел поблагодарить за фотки, которыми проиллюстрировал новость, а то вчера аж руки опускались. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Cross Leopolis.jpg[edit]

Не поможете с переводом?[edit]

Доброго здоровья! Для лучшей иллюстрации статей о пасхальном яйце-Писанке создал категорию Pisanka. Теперь её удаляет и убирает всё содержимое один участник. Я хочу разобраться в причинах — не поможете перевести с польского страницу Category talk:Pisanka? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandera id card 1946.jpeg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Plaques in Vilnius

Affected:

File:KraszewskiWilno1.jpg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emblems of Tuva[edit]

I don't know if you know these to emblems yet. You wrote [12] that there was a border change in 1932 and uploaded that map. What do you think - should these emblems show the pre- or post-1932 border. The maps in source files are not really detailed.--Antemister (talk) 21:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First one was composed using my map you've mentioned (but not using the original emblem)
Second one was created de nomine using original File:Coat of arms of Tuvan People's Republic (1943-1944).jpg, but boundaries at this new handmade map are not original, you see.
We have this source with flag/emblem set.
We have this emblems too.
We have this order of 1943
We have banknotes with Tuva boundary shape
We have [13][14] post marks

So I'm sure of the Commons emblems inaccuracy as even if boundaries at an original emblem are not correct we can not "update" them. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I compared several source images, and as their quality is usually rather low I am not sure which version of the borders is the one which fits more to the original images. What do you think?--Antemister (talk) 09:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned in the Tuvan People's Republic discussion page that after 1932 Tuvan-Mongolian border treaty Tuvan side continued cartographically claim Darkhad Valley. You can find both extremely SW Tuvan territory tip (it was annexed in 1932) and Darkhad Valley at Tuvan national emblem and post marks and banknotes. But we need just make boundaries the same as in relevant period Tuvan reliable sources, I see.

Look at File:Coat of arms of Tuvan People's Republic (1943-1944).jpg - you can find Mongun-Tayginsky District (annexed in 1932) and a convexity at Eastern border which corresponds the Darkhad Valley (lost in 1932 or in 1925) . Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it seems that the pre-1932 borders should remain on the emblems. Another question is the that "tuvan peninsula" russian territory you mention in 2) of [[15]] Is a source that that area was annexed by the Soviet Union? In my opinion, that map does not really imply this.--Antemister (talk) 13:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boundaries at the emblem are the maximum extend of the Tuvan territory and Tuvan claims: when Mongun-Tayginsky District was annexed by Tuva the Darkhad Valley was Mongolian not Tuvan, by at the national emblem the national boundaries are including both Mongun-Tayginsky District (in Tuva since 1932) and Darkhad Valley (lost in 1925 or 1932). The same shape at Tuvan banknotes, you see. That is why I'm sure we definitely need this 'combined' boundaries shape at the national emblem.

Upper Us River peninsula is not present at this emblem and this. At the Soviet map of 1928 File:Атлас Союза Советских Социалистических Республик 1928 - карта СССР (NW).jpg we can see pre-1932 boundaries with Darkhad Valley in Tuva but Us peninsula out (in Soviet Union), Mongun-Tayginsky District is in Mongolia. But at the Soviet 1939 map Darkhad Valley is Mongolian, Mongun-Tayginsky District is Tuvan, Us peninsula is Soviet. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 14:47, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalinin Avenue at Moscow, Postcard of the Soviet Union, 1973.jpg[edit]

File:Kalinin Avenue at Moscow, Postcard of the Soviet Union, 1973.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kalinin Avenue at Moscow, Postcard of the Soviet Union, 1973.jpg Kaluga.2012 (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rej[edit]

Przepraszam nie chciałam nic zepsuć, wg mnie to ta sama grafika, ale nie muszą mieć racji. Nie wiem jak usunąć moją wersję. Wgram ją jako osobną. Przepraszam nie chciałam namieszać, wydało mi się że grafika jest niezbyt ostra i straciła szczegóły w czasie skanowania i przetwarzania. Ale się nie upieram. Jeszcze raz przepraszam Pozdrawiam Airam57 (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obie grafiki pochodzą chyba z tego samego źródła, a różnice wynikają prawdopodobnie z dawnej techniki druku. Trzeba było przekopiować je na klocki drukarskie, a to nie była tak dokładna metoda jak skan komputerowy. Wstawiłam już moją wersję pt. "Mikołaj Rej z Nagłowic". Ciekawe ile jeszcze wersji tej grafiki się znajdzie. Pozdrawiam Airam57 (talk) 14:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Карта Новосибирск[edit]

Есть такая карта всей области? С грницами сельских поселении. File:Novosibirsk, Russia, suburban zone.png--Kaiyr (talk) 09:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaryadye.jpg[edit]

С форума[edit]

Отвечу уже тут. Коммонс это не самостоятельный субъект, Коммонс это всего лишь фотобанк такой. И разумеется, я общаюсь с людьми и транслирую их мнение .
Гугль и Яндекс не разрешают «широкой публике» ничего, как видно из [их лицензии], где прямо указано: «исключительно для личного некоммерческого использования».
Учёные получают от издателей деньги в виде бесплатной публикации. Посмотрите внимательнее на свободные научные журналы — такие журналы берут «плату за публикацию с автора, работодателя или спонсора». А коммерческие научные журналы берут плату с читателей.
Наконец, вы смешали воедино научные журналы и бизнес-архитектуру. Это совсем разные штуки. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Вот именно: издатели берут с ученых деньги за публикацию (свою монографию я печатал в научном издательстве на деньги со своего гранта), либо публикуют в журнале бесплатно (то есть я им ничего не плачу), но не платят гонораров ни авторам, ни ученым-рецензентам, а только себе любимым не забывая брать неплохие деньги за журналы с читателей. Потребность в таких журналах только та, что они имеют реноме (не печатают отровенную халтуру), а у нас (и у них) не придумали иных способов взвесить научный труд как килограммы публикаций и ссылок на них.
- Бизнесмены от архитектуры как раз берут свое через гонорары - так устроен этот бизнес уже не первый век. А гонорары (в частности) являются функцией от известности ранее сделанных работ, а потому паблисити, которое делают публикации их работ в Интернете, объективно им на руку. Потому не стоит путать фундаментальную науку и архитектурный бизнес - тут Вы совершенно правы. Это очень разные занятия. Ибо ученому важно распространить свои работы среди коллег (более они никому не интересны), а вот бизнесмены-архитекторы хотят и распространить изображения своих работ среди широких масс потенциальных клиентов, да еще и денег за это получить. Теперь они лишились этой возможности, придется им обходиться тем, чем обходились поколения архитекторов прошлого - гонорарами. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baku in 1870.JPG[edit]

I've just realized that you upload a black and white version of this file under the same name (one year ago). It's not very respectful of the person (me) who chose to upload the original sepia version. Therefore could you upload the B&W version under another file name and do the necessary to keep the sepia version available under the original name. Thank you for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I photographed the picture myself as it was exhibited within the Maiden Tower. The print exhibited there is a sepia print. So don't tell me the original is in B&W ! This is absolutely not a question of white balance ! The original print (at least the one exhibited there) is sepia. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:59, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to misunderstand me. There might be some "over-orange" colour in my reproduction due to my white balance when I took the photograph myself. But the print exhibited on a wall of the Maiden Tower was sepia, not B&W ! I clearly remember that. How am I suppose to explain that again so that you'll understand that ?! Would you claim my eyes had a bad white balance too so that I saw it in sepia ?!!! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well I explained it several times ! Anyway...

The "new" (3rd) version is not really sepia, is it ? You may think I'm crazy but I remember it was quite "brown" (therefore closer to the first "orange" version than the current B&W version). Maybe more like this one. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:57, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In a way, it could be a good idea to keep it in B&W since sepia is a print process of a B&W film. But on the other hand, even B&W prints can have different process and therefore different B&W. That's why I wanted to keep close to the print I saw and photographed. In that case, my original "orange sepia" file is closer to the exhibited print than a B&W version. Why couldn't we keep my original upload (with its imperfections) and propose your B&W version under another title ? In that case (that's actually what I asked you first), any user would have the choice of two different processes.

NB : I know the Lybian example was not an "original sepia", I just wanted to find a file that would look close to my memory of the "right" colour I saw there. But it's a few years ago so how could I be sure ? that's exactly why my idea of 2 different files might be a better idea than trying to find the "correct sepia" ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm not sure this 'orange' version encyclopedic values for the Wikipedia are better then b&w version" > well it's not really up to you to decide that, is it ? As I said already, it would have been better it you initially proposed an alternative version of this file under another name (as, for instance, Calibas did it with this picture of mine). We would have not discussed like that for "nothing" !

"We are storing imagery at Commons with the purpose to use these files in Wikipedia, isn't it?" > well nope. At least not only, because it would mean that any picture that is not used in a WP article may be deleted. No, Commons has the purpose to propose a variety of files about many subjects, therefore that could be used elsewhere than WP and other Wikimedia projects.

"Your reaction was emotional" > a little bit but not only. I think it is quite inconvenient to upload a file over another file when there's such a change in its correction. If you kept the sepia process with just an attenuation of the "orange" problem of white balance, I may have understood. But no, you proposed a completely different process, therefore you completely despised the original print exhibited in the Maiden Tower.

Why is it so difficult for you to understand that it may be better to have an alternative B&W file instead of what you've done ? (NB : Indeed I've never said the B&W version was useless, I actually think it's a good idea, but I think it's normal to keep the "original" sepia version, even with a slight edit to improve the orange problem). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I knew you would say that (that I'm not the author compare to the example I gave you). But you gave the answer of your remark yourself : the picture of Baku has an author too and he probably decided to have a sepia processed print, so who are we to determine a B&W version is better ? Proposing an alternative B&W version under another name (a solution that you seem not to understand !) is a far better idea because you keep a sepia "original" version of it, that you may also correct slightly for the over-orange balance. Is that so hard to understand ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I haven't realized that the 3rd version you uploaded was sepia. I think it could be a little more "brown/orange" to be closer to the print as I remember it, but it's already better than the B&W version. Thanks for that. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"But 'sepia' was not an artistic trick, but this was a routine technology with the aim to protect paper photocopy from the time destroying" > I know, but we don't care about that ! It doesn't change what I already wrote : a sepia process had been used to the copy exhibited in the Maiden Tower so we should respect it - which doesn't prevent us to propose an alternative B&W file under a second name. Isn't it simple ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you or me can judge it the photographer can be called an artist. We don't care about that, it's the author anyway, just I'm the author (and not the artist) of the picture of the rusty car of Oradour we discussed about. And as you said for it, it was normal that a corrected version of it was uploaded under another file name. Same logic here.

Now that you found the postcard on the Internet, shouldn't we use this copy instead ? At least it gives us the tone of the sepia used for this processing. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know. From the beginning, you answered me with despise. I kept being calm but I'm starting to be very sick of it ! I know paper is ageing, you really think I'm dumb ? But I'm also quite sure the print I've seen in the Maiden Tower was a sepia print and not (or not only) a question of aging.

As for Papamoskich, as I said, we don't care if he's an artist/photographer or not. He's the author, that's all what counts.

Anyway, this talk is starting to be really stupid and useless. Let's keep your second corrected version and let's move on. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. I'm getting bored. We seem unable to understant each other. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вибори Президента України 2014.png[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument of Independence (Kiev)

Affected:

File:Kiev Independence Square cropped.jpg

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:36, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GDP per capita of Transcaucasia[edit]

Hi,

you can do a favour for me and update this GDP curve till end of 2014: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Transcaucasia_GDP_PPP_in_constant_prices_per_capita.png

It is exactly what I need :)

Useful were also af future estimation, e.g. with dotted lines. I can promise you: Highly likely high ranking NATO members would see your graph. Or tell me simply, where I can find out the data "GDP per capita (PPP, 2005 constant prices, US$)" that fit to your curve. The data I found are real prices in $ and do not fit to your graph.

Perhaps we can discuss it: falk.oberdorf@shape.nato.int

Thanks,

Here are data (GDP etc.) In April will be first estimation for 2014 and will be possible to correct image with most recent data. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sici.jpg[edit]

File:Khar-Nuur, Mongolia, hi-res.JPG[edit]

Hi, please do not turn this image on its head. It's not an orthonormal satellite picture that needs to be north-south oriented, but an shot taken by hand at a significant vertical angle. It looks really weird when oriented the wrong way (the shape of the mountains makes no sense). Thanks! --Latebird (talk) 10:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Народный референдум Харьковской области 7.03.2014.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Presidential Administration of Ukraine

Affected:

File:Kiev 11.jpg

Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not any original uploader of this image, so, please, stop spam my page with senseless 'warnings'. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Сообщения о вынесении на удаление автоматически размещаются скриптом на СО каждого принимавшего участие в загрузке всех версий файла, и это скорее правильно, так как зачастую загрузивший последнюю версию может оказаться единственным, для кого вопрос существования файла в проекте ещё актуален. Sealle (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

question about Belarus stuff[edit]

Hello. I talked to you some time ago. Tell me, could you give me a link that has boundaries for selsoviets in Belarus? You gave a link before, but it does not work now. Kind regards, (Lilic (talk) 04:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Here are maps with boundaries of selsovets for every district of Belarus. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 07:25, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but, thank you ! (Lilic (talk) 17:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi, and first of all s'novim godom/ have a good new year.

I did some digging and was aware of the link that you linked to me. Thanks for it nonetheless. When I first saw it it had 70% of the selsoviets. Do you know if that link will eventually have 100% of them? Are they working on adding the remaining ones? (Lilic (talk) 00:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

I hope it will be completed, but when? And some common boundaries were not verified and are so called 'spaghetti'. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Famine Kharkov 1933.jpg[edit]

File:Mikalojus Konstantinas Čiurlionis photo portrait.jpg[edit]

While they bring out the detail, I suspect they change the image a bit too much. It changes what appears to be a black-haired man in a dark suit to a grey-haired man in a grey suit - the effect is visually appealing, but I don't think it's accurate. Also, I had cleaned up the edges and scratches a lot before the change. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did a google image search of Ciurlionis. He clearly has darkish hair, a movie version gave him brown hair, but without contemporary depiction I'd be caution in that. A heavily damaged, including apparent water damaged copy of the same photo is a bad reference source for the photo's colours, but things like [16], [17], [18], [19], and, perhaps especially, [20] all indicate that the colours shouldn't be lightened too much. If his hair looks a different colour than every single other depiction, I'd be very uncomfortable. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daghestan ethnographic and administrative map 1886.jpg[edit]

File:Matejko Battle of Grunwald.jpg[edit]

hi, you have damaged all notes in this file by overwriting it with ne version, despite the note to not overwrite the file.

Please sign your messages, dear collegue.
What was damaged? Original image from the source site was uploaded with no cropping. This image size is original. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 03:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:A starving child during the Famine of 1921-22 in Ukraine.jpg

How do you know that this is exactly what you wrote about? - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:A_starving_child_during_the_Famine_of_1921-22_in_Ukraine.jpg&diff=187302566&oldid=131525156 --HOBOPOCC (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All history in EnWiki [21] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah! OK! Now it's clear, but source of photo to be mentioned correctly, not as now (livejournal, etc). --HOBOPOCC (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah! Try to read the source of the image carefully and you will see no livejournal. OK? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear BogomolovPL, would you be so kind to explain what is the reason, you are returning repeatedly edits mentioned livejournal as a source for the foto - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:A_starving_child_during_the_Famine_of_1921-22_in_Ukraine.jpg&diff=187475512&oldid=187473167 ? It should be clear for everyone, that sources like livejournal and other blogs can't be RS for anything. HOBOPOCC (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- First uploaded image version was obtained from livejournal. It is the real file history. Me, you, nobody can change this history. That is why in the source description is written

former image source [22]; current image source [23]

- as it is a factual information. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nadiya Savchenko, Moscow court, 10 February 2015 03.jpg[edit]

File:Nadiya Savchenko, Moscow court, 10 February 2015 03.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nadiya Savchenko, Moscow court, 10 February 2015 03.jpg 2003:45:5C6F:1201:C456:16A2:6971:CBDB 10:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument of Independence (Kiev)

Affected:

File:Kyiv mainsquare.jpg

Yours sincerely, Base (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Р. Астроўскі.png[edit]

File:MWankowiczMonteCassino.jpg[edit]

File:Kharkov air overview (1941).jpg[edit]

Фотография белки[edit]

Здравствуйте, уважаемый участник, хотел бы Вас попросить не трогать мою фотографию белки.
C уважением
Skelanard (talk) 09:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Хотя, версия от 08:01, 5 ноября 2016 выглядит действительно лучше, пусть наверное она и останется. Просто она у меня изначально отображалась в версии идентичной 12:06, 24 октября 2016, которая «съела» все цвета. Но больше думаю уже ничего не стоит делать.

С уважением

Skelanard (talk) 09:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Уважаемый участник! Приятно, что Вы сделали этот замечательный снимок и сочли возможным загрузить его на Коммонз. Однако с этого момента сделанная Вами фотография белки перестала быть Вашей собственностью. Ныне эта фотография является общественным достоянием Вашего личного авторства.
- Фотографии загружают на Коммонз с целью их использования в статьях Википедии, не так ли? Использование в статьях предполагает удобство получения искомой информации, в нашем случае мною была скорректирована гистограмма Вашего снимка, сделанного против света, с целью добиться того, чтобы и дерево и, что главное, белка были лучше видны. Если Вы поглядите на мой вклад, то заметите, что это то, что я рутинно проделываю для множества изображений, которые ранее были загружены на Коммонз. Когда я аналогичную операцию проделал с фотографией американского политика File:Roque De La Fuente (cropped).jpg, российского кинорежиссера File:Арсений Гончуков.jpg, белорусского историка File:Gennadzi Saganovich - in Minsk city - Belarus - 18 April 2016 AD - d.JPG, бухарской красавицы File:Boukhara 4749a.jpg или марша польских фашистов File:ONR poznan.jpg то это, надеюсь, не вызовет Вашего личного неприятия?
- Поэтому, исходя исключительно из стремления к общей пользе, я полагаю целесообразным использовать на Коммонз и в Википедии версии Вашего снимка с скорректированной яркостью (усиление яркости затененных частей изображения), что позволяет лучше увидеть энциклопедический контент изображения.
- С уважением, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Я не отрицаю того, что сделанное мной фото белки теперь является общественным достоянием моего личного авторства, поэтому я именно попросил Вас его не трогать, а не потребовал. Что касается контента — в примерах приведённых Вами изображениях качество снимков для энциклопедического контента явно улучшилось, в то время как у белки в версии 12:06, 24 октября 2016 хоть и было улучшено экспонирование, но сильно упало качество цветов. Тем не менее в версии от 09:37 сегодняшнего дня это исправлено, поэтому я считаю её лучшим вариантом.
  P.S. Считаю не совсем правильным обозначение членов организации на этом фото как польских фашистов, однако не хочу дискутировать по этому вопросу. Также не считаю женщину на этом фото красавицей, но это моё субъективное мнение, которое я никому не навязываю :-)
  C уважением
  Skelanard (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Польскими фашистами их характеризуют АИ, я лишь повторил их оценки. Сам лично я имел общение с польскими крайними националистами, которые полагают, что польское правительство состоит из одних евреев, все польские и европейские СМИ и экономические структуры управляются ими же. Что касается бухарской красавицы, то она проходит в качестве иллюстрации фенотипа узбечек, я это изображение не загружал. Меня лишь расстроило то, что баланс белого явно нарушен. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pdoroshenko.jpg[edit]

File:Jeltoqsan scene.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monuments and memorials in Aşgabat

Affected:

File:Pushkin statue in Ashgabat.jpg

Yours sincerely, Яй (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not any original file uploader, stop placing senseless warnings at my talkpage, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antoni Owsianik.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:NoFoP-Russia

Affected:

File:Monument to Lenin in the centre of Yoshkar Ola.jpg

And also:

Extended content
File:Monument to Ostap Bender in Elista.JPG File:Zhangir Khan.jpg

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- I'm not any original file uploader, stop placing senseless warnings at my talkpage, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhangir Khan.jpg[edit]

File:Monument to Ostap Bender in Elista.JPG[edit]

File:Monument to Lenin in the centre of Yoshkar Ola.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Roger Pic

Affected:

File:Aram Khachaturian, Pic, 17.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 21:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not any original file uploader, stop placing senseless warnings at my talkpage, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 06:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Talk to the creators of the 'Nominate for deletion' gadget. Or better, suggest it at the Commons:Village pump. Thanks --Discasto _talk 07:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC) PS: watching your discussion it seems as if you should have done it months ago. LOL[reply]

File:Bieł-čyrvona-bieły ściah, Pahonia. Бел-чырвона-белы сьцяг, Пагоня (1920).jpg[edit]

Добрый день. На мой вгляд, добавление фонового коричневого цвета (а ранее желтого) — это результат старения материала (под воздействием солнечного света), а не оригиальная цветопередача. Например, вот здесь [24] (немного другая версия той же открытки) прекрасно видно, что коричневый цвет — результат старения бумаги. К том же, если посмотреть на красный цвет, то на моих версиях файла он действительно красный (как и на первой пожелтевшей открытке), а на ваших — скорее малиновый. Это говорит о том, что в цветопередачу внесены искажения, что недопустимо. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

В предложенном Вами другом варианте проблема не только (и не столько) старения бумаги, но и т.н. баланса белого (неверная передача цветов электронным устройством, см тут пример), я же исходил из того, что белая часть флага должна быть белой. Это и позволило откалибровать цвет - красный стал красным, белый - белым. То, что Ваша почтовая открытка в одном варианте голубого цвета, а в другом - розового, это результат нарушения баланса белого. Просто разного нарушения. Разумеется, что исправление баланса белого позволяет понять и то, каков истинный цвет остальных частей почтовой открытки. Достаточно рутинная процедура. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Все-таки красный у Вас был совсем не красным (значения зеленого и синего каналов были далеки от нуля). Сейчас загрузил версию, где белый остался действительно белым (все по 255, как и у Вас), но и красный также без искажений. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Прекрасно! Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Война правок и не общепринятая ваша схема раскраски[edit]

Добрый день! Зачем вы тут развели войну правок? [25], [26], [27]. Вы прекрасно знаете почему ваши версии отменены, хоть здесь и не русская Википедия, а ваши схемы раскраски не приняты как обязательные, они вами лишь вами приняты, поэтому ваши претензии заведомо необоснованны и притянуты игрой правилами. Вами приведённые тут примеры подтверждают: это не общепринятая раскраска, а вами принятая раскраска. Причём тут области Норвегии. Это регионы страны, а не части городов. Причём тут районы городов Казахстана? Когда мы говорим о районах городов России. Факт в том, что я работал с районами городов России и с их картами и не видел ни одной такой карты с вами принятой раскраской. Привести примеры всех карт городов России? Поэтому именно я применяю то, что принято в категориях карт районов городов России. Прошу не вести войну правок под надуманными вами предлогами. Ваша раскраска, во-первых, не общепринятая. Во-вторых, она не касается городов России. В-третьих, она противоречит тому, о чём мы с вами уже говорили. Здесь не историческая карта территорий, подчинённых райсоветам, а карта районов города Симферополя. Чтобы отразить украинскую точку зрения на райсоветы, территория, подчинённая райсовету, показана была другим оттенком этого цвета. Хотя думаю что и она уже не так актуальна. Ещё раз прошу не вести войну правок.--RosssW (talk) 07:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2017 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Ukraine[edit]

Вітаємо!

Запрошуємо взяти участь у міжнародному фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! До 30 вересня включно Ви можете подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Звертаємо увагу, що завантажені матеріали будуть враховуватися у тій версії файлу, що був на час завершення конкурсу, тож якщо у Вас гарне фото, вантажте його одразу у високій роздільності. З регламентом конкурсу можна ознайомитися тут.

Якщо у Вас дуже багато фото, скористайтеся масовими завантажувачами або зверніться до нас.

Окрім традиційних номінацій за найкращі фото і найбільшу кількість сфотографованих об'єктів, у конкурсі також є спецномінація для Ваших відеоматеріалів про пам'ятки. Якщо у Вас розмір відеофайлу завеликий для конкурсного завантажувача, спробуйте скористатися стандартним завантажувачем, але не забудьте поставити ідентифікатор пам'ятки. Якщо виникатимуть будь-які труднощі — пишіть нам на wlmwikimediaukraine.org.ua

Приєднуйтеся! Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться у блозі конкурсу. – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 21:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Памятник Куйбышеву в Краматорске.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kolas@Maur.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bogomolov.PL

Affected:

File:Помним депортацию 2014.jpg

And also:

Extended content
File:Крым Россия.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be civil[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

You are acting in an uncivil manner. Please remain civil and don't resort to making personal attacks or instigate edit wars. If your behaviour is not moderated, you may be blocked from further editing.

Sealle (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for for 2 hours. The reason for the block is harassment after warnings (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Sealle (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here circumstances of this warning [28]. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017 Kazakh Latin Alphabet.jpg[edit]

File:YakovSverdlov.jpg[edit]

Category:Pavel_Bogomolov[edit]

Category:Pavel_Bogomolov has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Kaganer (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khalkhin Gol Soviet offensive 1939.jpg[edit]

Просьба сделать файл[edit]

Вырежите изображение Геннадия Гагулии из этого файла https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vladimir_Putin_7_March_2003-1.jpg Панн (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано: File:Gennadi Gagulia.jpg Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg Jcb (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

You have overwritten File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg with a file from a different source. You also broke the information box on that file. File:Garegin Nzhdeh.jpg was overwritten with a version I'm not convinced is (much) sharper, but does have more noise. The original is clearly easier on the eye. When you have any doubt, please upload as a new file. Thank you. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg must be deleted from Commons as it is not the original image of 1919 postcard but its modern edited version (from 2008) which differs from original PD-Old version.
Uploaded version of File:Garegin Nzhdeh.jpg has not a "noise" but original silver graines photo image structure; the image you describes "The original" and "clearly easier on the eye" is a sort of modern (digital) editing and has to be deleted from Commons as a new one. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The version of the photo you uploaded has much stronger JPEG artefacts. Nothing original about that. The new version of the map was sourced to moddb.com. But what you're saying is that that image was from the original 1919 postcard? Either way you still broke the information box. And you should have uploaded your file as a new file. If the existing File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg would be deemed copyvio it will be redirected to the file you uploaded. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: More textured images are creating more jpeg artefacts. It is JPEG algorithm nature, indeed. But even you can not claim all textures the "jpeg artefacts", isn't it? I don't like JPEG format too, but image I've found is in this format.
Yesterday I've uploaded the new file File:Map of Ukraine (postcard 1919).jpg, and? But this will not change illegal nature of the File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg as modern (2008?) image, I guess. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want a zoomed in comparison of the artefacts? Your version really looks worse, even if (which I'm not sure about) it contains slightly more detail. Your file is not an uncontroversial improvement and because of that should be uploaded as a new file.
Thanks for uploading the 1919 map as a new file! If you believe File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg is a copyright violation, please nominate it for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: It is not any question of my beliefs - File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg file description tells us this definitely: this is a modern edited reprint of the original image (File:Map of Ukraine (postcard 1919).jpg) and we clear see differences in these two images.
And again about File:Garegin Nzhdeh.jpg: existing version is a sort of modern remastering of the scanned original photo image. My grey scale image is closer to the original one and is the source of your "yellow" image, which has the same scanning process artefacts (you can see vertical stripes thru all the image, this scanning artefact are better visible in shadows and are routine to the very old scanners) but original image textures (you are calling them "artefacts") were filtered manually, after that this somebody reduced resolution of the image and added "sepia" effect imitation (yellow color).
OK, I will upload original file version to make possible to delete a modern one. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg may be from a 2008 reprint, however the question would be if that reprint is sufficiently different from the original to aquire new copyright. That would require a discussion. When you overwrite that file, a revision deletion would be needed but the discussion would also still be needed. This makes everything rather complicated. If you need to heavily alter the description after uploading a new version, it is a clear indicator it would be better to upload it as a new file. If you believe the existing file should no longer be used, you can add {{Superseded}} to it and/or nominate it for deletion if it is a copyright violation.
The sepia version of File:Garegin Nzhdeh.jpg may well be derived from the black and white version you uploaded. When I said "original" I meant "the version originally uploaded". It is a good reason to upload the black and white version as a new file. As you can see on Commons:Overwriting existing files, an original file should not be overwritten with a "digital restoration". The reverse will also be true. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 10:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg is not "may be from a 2008 reprint" but is from a 2008. But this "reprint" is not a copy of ancient image, but it is a new one only inspired with the original map. You can compare to original File:Map of Ukraine (postcard 1919).jpg - this "reprint" is a completely different map: all geographic features are different in shape, some features are missed, but other are not present at the original image, even "Ukraine" area shapes were not copied, but were redrawn manually and are different in every detale. I'm PhD in cartography in my real life, you see.
Done: File:Garegin Nzhdeh (grey scale original).jpg. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:38, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"is not "may be from a 2008 reprint" but is from a 2008"

I find this a bit hard to explain, but this is just something that got lost in translation. For example:

> "We can't go to the zoo because the car is broken."

< "The car may be broken, but we could still take the bus to the zoo, couldn't we?"

It doesn't mean I disagree with you or even doubt you, it just means I am unable to verify the fact independent from your statement. As I can't verify it, I prefer not to state it as a fact myself. Thanks for uploading File:Garegin Nzhdeh (grey scale original).jpg! - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: But now is time to delete File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg, I guess. Definitely. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on your system and settings, there is a link "Nominate for deletion" (Номинировать на удаление) on the left on that page. You may need to enable AjaxQuickDelete in your preferences on the "Gadgets" (Гаджеты) tab. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz: Couple days ago you've supported my request for an other file deletion (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Novogrudok 5 prichin 01.jpg), so thank you, I know how to make a deletion request. Now you can see this new request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mapa from Ukraine postcard 1919.jpg and be sure with dramatic political history of this file at Commons (some persons disagreed with content of this map, but not its legal status). Now we have original map and don't need this new one. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't remember everything I respond to, I was confused as to why you hadn't nominated it for deletion yet so figured maybe you didn't know how. All good, thanks. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:06, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armen Sarkissian 2017.png[edit]

File:Armen Sarkissian 2017.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armen Sarkissian 2017.png - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:АК-12 и АК-15.jpg[edit]

Я не являюсь оригинальным загрузчиком файла, я лишь скорректировал контраст изображения с целью сделать видимыми детали конструкции. Поэтому не было смысла размещать на моей странице обсуждения предупреждение об удалении. Было бы приятно, если бы Вы удалили это сообщение, так сам я это сделать не имею права. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 14:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erdoğan swears as 12th President of Turkey.jpg[edit]

Бахчекапылы, Айшенур вырезать её из этого файла, а то изображение маленькое!!!!Панн (talk) 11:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Андрей Чертков.jpg[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Андрей_Чертков.jpg ссылка — Preceding unsigned comment added by Панн (talk • contribs) 17:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

вырежете фото Андрея Черткова (он в сером пиджаке), коллега!!!! Панн (talk) 11:03, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir Putin 20 September 2000-5.jpg[edit]

вырезать фото человека, слева от президента России!!! Панн (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vladimir_Pekhtin_2002-02-19.jpg[edit]

вставите в статью о владимире пехтине!!!! Панн (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Adm.nnov.ru

Affected:

File:Андрей Чертков.jpg

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola _talk 15:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Памятник русскому учёному П.П.Семёнову-Тянь-Шанскому.jpg[edit]

File:Могила актёра Михаила Пуговкина.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Posters by Viktor Deni

Affected:

File:Polish Pig trained in Paris, Russian propaganda poster 1920.PNG

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Barnaulpanorama201408.JPG[edit]

File:W b5d1435bb.jpg[edit]

File:Бауыржан Момыш-улы.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Alasha Khan Mausoleum.jpg[edit]

I am not an original uploader, I have corrected rotation and contrast of the image I didn't uploaded. Please don't place warnings at my talk page as it is senseless, image past or image future is not interesting for me, but this kind of warnings are making me a sort of 'hooligan' who is an illegal content uploader. Thank you, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The notification is sent automatically to all uploaders when tagging a file as missing permission using the QuickDelete gadget, in accordance with Commons' deletion policy. Presumably, the rationale is that if you've put some work into a file, you might be interested in knowing if there's a risk that your work might be deleted, so that you can voice any objections that you might have. I don't think anyone would think that you're a hooligan for receiving a notification like that, and if anyone does, I'd be happy to point them at the upload log to help set the record straight. Cheers, —LX (talk, contribs) 23:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I am correcting a lot of files I am this kind of warnings receiver. So my talk page is a collection of warnings. This is definitely making me a sort of users not respecting Commons upload policy. It is not comfortable for me, you see. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 23:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry about that. It's not my intention to make you feel uncomfortable. Your cleanup work is appreciated, and it should be no reflection on you if the original uploader's didn't do things properly. Again, these notifications are mandated by policy. If you don't care about them, you can always archive them. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmad-Kasravi.jpg[edit]

File:Евгений Петросян .jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.JPG[edit]

File:Bukeykhanov.jpg[edit]

Коллега! Зачем Вы испортили этот портрет? Hunu (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

А в чем испорченность? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen. Wojciech Jaruzelski 13 grudnia 1981.JPG[edit]

File tagging File:Session VRU 27042010.jpg[edit]

File:Polikarpov.jpg[edit]

File:Kartashov Valentin3.jpg[edit]

I am not an original uploader, I have corrected contrast of the image I didn't uploaded. Please don't place warnings at my talk page as it is senseless, image past or image future is not interesting for me, but this kind of warnings are making me a sort of 'hooligan' who is an illegal content uploader. Thank you, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Штурм Аула Ахты[edit]

Здравствуйте, загрузил недавно этот файл File:Штурм аула Ахты.jpg, не посмотрев, что он здесь уже есть (File:Storm of the fortress of Akhty 1848.jpg), но моя версия качественней, чем прежняя. Можно ли задним числом соединить файлы?--Apr1 (talk) 13:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Кроме того, я погорячился ещё с двумя файлами, File:Портрет барона Штиглица.jpg, File:Портрет Александра Павловича Бенкендорфа.jpg, которые тоже уже существует здесь, причём в более высоком разрешении. Эти два файла хотелось бы удалить. --Apr1 (talk) 13:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Относительно Штурма Ахты: старый файл лучше, так как (1) он охватывает большую часть картины, а новый файл обрезает часть изображения и (2) старый файл и есть исходный источник для нового, который появился в результате двух операций: старый файл искусственно увеличили путем интерполяции и обрезали. Поэтому как раз новый файл не нужен. Вы можете удалить его нажав на странице этого файла (слева) "Номинировать на удаление" и описав причины, указывая на наличие исходного файла File:Storm of the fortress of Akhty 1848.jpg (обратите внимание на то, как следует записывать в тексте имена файлов, я только что привел пример - перед именем следует ставить двоеточие, а получившееся обрамлять двойными квадратными скобками).
Относительно Штиглица и Бенкендорфа: на соответствующих страницах поступаете ровно так же, как и в отношении файла про Ахты. Обязательно указывайте то, что есть более качественные файлы с приведением названий этих файлов (с двоеточием и квадратными скобками).
Идеально, если бы Вы написали бы свои заявки на удаление по-английски. Укажите, что именно Вы и являетесь тем, кто загрузил предлагаемые к удалению файлы - юридически процедура проще, если удалить просит тот, кто загрузил. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Спасибо вам большое.--Apr1 (talk) 08:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Petersburg rally 2012-02-25 (not in a row).jpg[edit]

Фотография Токаева[edit]

Здравствуйте, Я заметил, что вы отредактировали фотографию Токаева и сделали ее более качественной. Но проблема в том, что фотография слишком узкая. Я выложил картинку с более широкими размерами, поэтому на ней есть белые стороны. Я не могу это исправить, потому что вы единственный, у кого есть отредактированная фотография. Не могли бы вы исправить это, сохранив те же размеры 753 × 1094? --ShadZ01 (talk) 22:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Есть вещи совершенно неочевидные для меня.

1) Почему Вы сочли необходимым загрузить на Коммонз файл худшего качества, нежели тот, что размещен на официальном сайте Акорды [29] (где, собственно, и следовало бы изначально искать официальную съемку встречи)?

2) Почему для Вас лично принципиально чтобы размер картинки был именно 753 × 1094 пикселей? И не на пиксель больше, и не на пиксель меньше?

3) Почему для Вас так важно чтобы на фотографии меньше была доля занимаемая собственно лицом человека там изображенного, но выросла доля площади изображения, занимаемая костюмом, галстуком, сорочкой? Ведь эти предметы одежды не несут никакой дополнительной информации о человеке, изображенном на фотографии? В любом случае мы видим, что тот в костюме, сорочке и галстуке и на фоне государственного флага.

Но мне не сложно, я сделал столь желанный Вам файл. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (cropped postal covers)

Affected:

File:Pavel Batitsky (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kazakhstan obl ru.svg[edit]

Здравствуйте, можете обновить карту. Область переименовали и один город. Эта карта отражает административное деление Казахстана в 2001—2018 годах. Либо эту переименовать на подобии File:Kazakhstan 1959 ru.svg Спасибо заранее. --Sibom (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGB Okhotin.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (mug shots)

Affected:

File:MGB Okhotin.jpg

And also:

Extended content
File:Stanisław Pestkowski.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Moscow FOP cases/Plaques in Moscow

Affected:

File:House on Embankment memorial desk, memorial desk ded. to Vincas Mickevičius-Kapsukas.JPG

Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Валентин Феликсович Войно-Ясенецкий.jpg[edit]

File:Ivan Kozhedub, 1944.jpg[edit]

File:Ivan Kozhedub, 1944-1.jpg[edit]

File:Memorial to Holodomor victims 02 Kiev.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters of Afghan presidential election, 2009

Affected:

File:Aghanistan 2009 -- 'Go vote!'.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Holy Trinity Orthodox Church, Ulan Bator

Affected:

File:Holy Ttinity Church in Ulan Bator.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Borís Skósyrev.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Borís Skósyrev.jpg Didym (talk) 22:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Borís Skósyrev.jpg[edit]

File:Posiedzenie WRB i CBRW.jpg[edit]

Коллега, добрый день! Зачем снижать разрешение в 10 раз? Hunu (talk) 10:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Central concert hall Kazakhstan

Affected:

File:Astana-concerthall.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bayterek Tower (Nur-Sultan)

Affected:

File:Astana 2010.jpg

And also:

Extended content
File:Bayterek Tower (Astana).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hazrat Sultan Mosque

Affected:

File:Hazret Sultan Mosque 2015.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Manjali mosque

Affected:

File:Manjali mosque atyrau.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lezgian people, dancing lezginka in Akhti village in Dagestanskaya Oblast. Beginingth of XX century.jpg[edit]

File:Lezgian people, dancing lezginka in Akhti village in Dagestanskaya Oblast. Beginingth of XX century.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lezgian people, dancing lezginka in Akhti village in Dagestanskaya Oblast. Beginingth of XX century.jpg Vendettaaa (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lezgian people Leki.jpg[edit]

File:Feteli Xan Xoyski.JPG[edit]

File:Uryankhay-Tuva AO.png[edit]

Привет Богомолов! Если мое добавление кажется вам проблематичным, пожалуйста, восстановите исходную версию, проблем нет. Но если вы считаете, что рельеф помогает определить местонахождение местности, и если вы знаете лучшую справочную информацию для НАСА, вы можете добавить их. Я доверяю тебе. Спасибо! --Claude Zygiel (talk) 09:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Duché de Lituanie et royaume de Pologne (1619).png[edit]

Привет. Это правда, что ваша карта намного лучше. Тот, который я исправил, добавив казаков, - это не произведение искусства, но, как и все схемы, технические схемы и картографический планы и документы, слишком общий, чтобы быть защищенным (лицензия "PD-ineligible"). Это не так? --Claude Zygiel (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Большое спасибо за все эти объяснения. Поэтому я сделал то, что вы мне сказали: [30]. --Claude Zygiel (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Безусловно. Но ты профессионал. Я только хотел добавить казачьи земли (еще не Гетманщину) на карту Dgreusarda. Вот что я вам предлагаю. 1) - Запросить удаление карты Dgreusard и той, которую я создал на ее основе. 2) - Позвольте мне сделать производную карту вашей карты [31], раскрасив казачьи земли по-другому (с номером 6 в легенде), или создайте эту карту самостоятельно, если хотите. Как вы думаете ? --Claude Zygiel (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Для «казачьих земель» используются источники Hans-Erich Stier (главный редактор) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, ISBN 3-14-100919-8, страницы 102 и 113 (с упоминанием «Wilde Felder» der Saporoger Kosaken). Для карты, которую я сделал, вот новая версия, без владений Вишневецкого File:Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth 1619.png. Что касается административной карты Монголии, я думаю, вы можете быть очень счастливы увидеть, на какой «вы были полезны». Для наших предков мы должны были быть «врагами», потому что они воевали друг с другом, но с тех пор планета «Терра» сильно изменилась. Я предпочитаю дружбу

. --Claude Zygiel (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
«Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

File:Pavel Batitsky (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Pavel Batitsky (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Redboston 09:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Церковь Святого Воскресения (Лачин).jpg[edit]

File:Церковь Святого Воскресения (Лачин).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JxSpec (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morana.jpg[edit]

File:Morana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hoa binh (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:GAVRILINA.jpg[edit]

File:GAVRILINA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No free license at YouTube

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Lymantria (talk) 06:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Сочи[edit]

Добрый день! Вы сделали адм.карту Краснодара в File:Krasnodar city (Russia) divisions (colored).png. А можете ли сделать такую же адм. карту Сочи? А то эта карта File:Greater Sochi map rus.png слишком дремучая;) RosssW (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

На самом-то деле надо корректировать карту Краснодара, так как за прошедшие годы поменялась городская черта, на что есть соответствующий закон.
Что касается Сочи, то, понятно, карта, про которую Вы говорите, сделана без представления о том, каково на самом деле АТД Сочи, т.е. масса фактических поселков, которые тем не менее с 1961 года входят в городскую черту Сочи, а также сель- и поссоветы со своими населенными пунктами. Кроме того, за последние годы был образован пгт Дагомыс с особым статусом, а также из состава города исключена территория пгт Сириус. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:26, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Да, так и есть. Было бы неплохо, если бы вы сделали и то, и другое ;) RosssW (talk) 07:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zhovkva-greetings gate 1941.jpg[edit]

Do you have more information about the source of Zhovkva-greetings_gate_1941.jpg? It seems you had an independent source for the image than the pre-2018 version. Thank you very much, --Treck08 (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yakub Kolas in office.jpg[edit]

File:Yakub Kolas in office.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:03, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed color scheme set UTC hue4maps[edit]

Please stop destroying the color harmony in the fixed color scheme set "UTC hue4maps". You have been told about it in 2019 refused to revert, have been reverted by others and did it again in 2022, see File:UTC hue4map KAZ.png and its talk page. UTChue4maps (talk) 00:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTChue4maps,

Done. --Achim55 (talk) 09:40, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Шухевич і Дяків.jpg[edit]

File:Шухевич і Дяків.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stecko.jpg[edit]

File:Stecko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Генеральна рада «Загону Червона калина» в Академічному домі у Львові, 21 жовтня 1928 року.jpg[edit]

File:Генеральна рада «Загону Червона калина» в Академічному домі у Львові, 21 жовтня 1928 року.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

H[edit]

So ? 2A02:6680:2103:A6:EDE5:9C6B:E969:64F8 00:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Оренбургский газоперерабатывающий завод. В. С. Черномырдин и А. Н. Косыгин..jpg[edit]

File:Оренбургский газоперерабатывающий завод. В. С. Черномырдин и А. Н. Косыгин..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fulhelm (talk) 08:11, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhovkva-greetings gate 1941.jpg[edit]

File:Zhovkva-greetings gate 1941.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AbaiPainting.jpg[edit]

File:AbaiPainting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paf zet (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Askar Mamin (2011).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Askar Mamin (2011).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Askar Mamin (2011).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ste moc 19:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breszt-Erőd.jpg[edit]

File:Breszt-Erőd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 23:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Uriankh-Tsongol.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Uriankh-Tsongol.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sparsumbar (talk) 21:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument to Georgy Zhukov, Ulan Bator, Mongolia.jpg[edit]

File:Monument to Georgy Zhukov, Ulan Bator, Mongolia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:A071:C4E7:6243:E452 09:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SukhbaatarSquare.jpg[edit]

File:SukhbaatarSquare.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Costumes of Uzbek men.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Costumes of Uzbek men.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Costumes of Uzbek men.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Threbirah (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ALAFurmanov.jpg[edit]

File:ALAFurmanov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 21:50, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pushkin statue in Ashgabat.jpg[edit]

File:Pushkin statue in Ashgabat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 21:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SternGM.jpg[edit]

File:SternGM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kursant504 (talk) 14:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manshuk Uralsk.jpg[edit]

File:Manshuk Uralsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 20:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Nazarbayev University.JPG

Yours sincerely, Prodraxis (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Лука (Войно-Ясенецкий).jpg[edit]

File:Лука (Войно-Ясенецкий).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Churuk-Su 1.JPG[edit]

File:Churuk-Su 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Churuk-Su 1.JPG[edit]

Приветствую. Не знаю, получится ли им объяснить, что Крымология работала по лицензии {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. С Ходыревым, автором снимка, я попытаюсь связаться (лично знаком), но он уехал в Болгарию после 2014 в знак протеста и на связь много лет не выходит kosun (talk) 17:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]