User talk:Didym
This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.
This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Didym.
This is the user talk page of Didym, where you can send messages and comments to Didym.
- Be polite.
- Be friendly.
- Assume good faith.
- No personal attacks.
- Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (
~~~~) at the end. - Put new text under old text.
- New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
- Click here to start a new topic.
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated[edit]
Hi, Is the description of the 3 photos now as it should be? Sultan Edijingo (talk) 08:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- No, as DW, those files are missing permission for the painting/sculptures. --Didym (talk) 12:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand: the artists posed for the photo with their own works of art. What permission is missing for what? --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Did you actually read COM:DW? The artist posing next to the work is not relevant for copyright. --Didym (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't understand: the artists posed for the photo with their own works of art. What permission is missing for what? --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- The artist posed together with own works. Obviously he gave me the permission to take a photo of himself and of his own artworks. If the artworks were from another artist, I understand the problem of DW, but in this case the artworks are works of the artist on the photo. --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 08:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- There is a difference between permission to take a photo and permission to publish it under a free license. --Didym (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- But what do you ask especially? I told them, that I will publish the photo on wikipedia under free license and they agreed, otherwise I hadn't taken the photo.--Sultan Edijingo (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- As all permissions, this needs to go through VRT. --Didym (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- But what do you ask especially? I told them, that I will publish the photo on wikipedia under free license and they agreed, otherwise I hadn't taken the photo.--Sultan Edijingo (talk) 18:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- There is a difference between permission to take a photo and permission to publish it under a free license. --Didym (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Link explaining free use[edit]
Thanks for your message on my talk page concerning the file Birgitte Anker.jpg. Here is a link to Statistics Denmark's website explaining its free use, but I do not know where I should provide the link:
https://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/brug-statistikken/kildeangivelse Økonom (talk) 12:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- If it's not obvious from the source, you can use the permission field in the information template to provide the link as I did here. --Didym (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)