User talk:EugeneZelenko

Archived messages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

Christian O'Brien's Grandson claim

Why are you lying here Zelenko? I don't recall Christian O'Brien having any Ukrainian grandchildren? [[1]] SpooksBGone (talk) 01:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Seems I can't delete this. I've blocked this editor on en.wiki and of course Zelenko wasn't the one who said they were O'Brien's grandson. Doug Weller (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Zelenko claimed that here [2] and is lying as Christian and Barbara Joy had no children. I am Anne O'Brien, Christian's Niece, who took that photo, which was different from the one deleted, so I should know. Why are you lying to delete photos of my Aunt and Uncle and persecute our family? SpooksBGone (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Apologies, I mistook you for the Jstars780 account that lied and stand corrected. Please research unsubstantiated claims about people's families better however. SpooksBGone (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Flag of Calgary, Alberta.svg

Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Time for a ban on DRs and speedy deletions? closed

I have closed Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Time for a ban on DRs and speedy deletions? as having a consensus for a three-month ban from speedy deletions and DRs. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

License issue with File:1846 Ludvig Verner Helms Daguerreotype.jpg

Hello, I noticed the subject file I uploaded has been flagged for an incorrect license. I am relatively new at this, and would appreciate any assistance that can be offered. I have read the licensing help pages.

The image is an ancestor of mine (Helms), and the image is in the possession of my family. Helms died in 1918, in England. So, assuming he is the "creator" of the image, it looks like the image should have a public domain license.

However, a copy of the image was published in a book in England "The Borneo Story" in 1956. The image was provided to the author by Helms' family at the time. The image I've used was not copied from the book; it came from the original in our possession. At the time I uploaded, I assumed any existing copyright from the book would not apply to my image since it didn't come from the book. But now I'm not so sure...

Any advice would be appreciated. This seems to be a complicated situation (for me, at least) that crosses international boundaries (I am in US) and can remove the image if that is the safest approach.

Thanks! GuildCV1 (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

@GuildCV1: I don't think that original photographer could be deduced, so {{PD-old-assumed}} is applicable. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

What about the copy published in the book in London in 1956? GuildCV1 (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

2D reproduction doesn't not create new copyrights. See w:en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! I'll update the copyright on the helms picture. GuildCV1 (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

If you're Christian O'Brien's Grandson, what nationality was your Great Grandmother? SpooksBGone (talk) 01:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

File:====㽅==== 1.jpg Copyright Problem

Hello. I am a Wikisource editor. I ported this file because it was an image taken by a South Korean national organization in charge of researching, collecting, compiling, promoting the study of historical materials on Korean history, called the National Institute of Korean History. The image was of a picture on an ancient historical text called the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty. I don't know much about Copyright, but please tell me the appropriate Copyright of such content.

Features:

This file's picture was a portion of a larger picture taken by a South Korean national organization, in South Korea, of a page of a book so old it is undoubtedly in the public domain. What should the Copyright of such image be? Blahhmosh (talk) 03:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

@Blahhmosh: Public domain media should be tagged with proper public domain tag. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/South Korea. Same applies for other similar files uploaded by you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

OK, but how do I change the copyright of a file? Blahhmosh (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Just click edit tab on file page and replace {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} with {{PD-South Korea}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Removal help request

Hi, please help to remove File:Moonray.jpg copied image from Times of India. Thanks. Run n Fly (talk) 05:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done by User:Túrelio. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Request

hi, could you restore these 19th century paintings please?? Thanks :)

• File:Krönung des Kaiser Ferdinand I. zum König der Lombardei-Venetien.png
• File:Die Krönung von Ferdinand I. von Österreich in Mailand.png
• File:Prozession zur Krönung von Ferdinand I. von Österreich in Mailand.png

Marliorum12 (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

 Info: Marliorum12 appears tp be a sockpuppet of LTA A3cb1, who in fact their used several socks for request undeletion of files originally uploaded by them or their other socks. See this CU request. 81.41.175.237 11:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

@Krd: : Sorry, I don't know history of particular user, but files look like reproductions of historical art taken from books. Is there strong reason for not restoring them? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

All claims made by A3cb1 are completely unreliable, and in many cases the situation was not as it looked like. If you can verify yourself by external sources, beyond being only plausible, that the images are PD, you are welcome to restore them. Krd 15:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 01:30, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

User:Niklem

Умер 2 марта 2023 года, см. [3] и ru:Обсуждение_участника:Niklem. Возможно, учётную запись нужно заморозить. С уважением, Romano1981 (talk) 08:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Сделано. Также защитил страницы участника и обсуждений и убрал права с учётной записи. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Шаблон что он администратор РВП тоже нужно убрать. Salsero al Zviadi (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

• Я бы попросил его переблокировать с тем же обоснованием, но декодированной ссылкой (вот как она приведена в первом сообщении темы), текущая ссылка страшно раздирает по ширине страницу CentralAuth Никлема. MBH 18:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

  Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Usada Pekora.png

I cannot understand why this file must be deleted. This picture is the screenshot of a video made by Sakura Miko upload on YouTube. It is licensed CC BY.  See here. The subject of the picture is Usada Pekora who is belongs to Hololive. And Sakura Miko is also belongs to Hololive. Despite they are belongs to same company, Why this picture is copyright violation？ 赤座 (talk) 15:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Best way to sort out all possible copyrights issues (such video release may be not authorized by company) would be to ask company to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree it is good way. Asking company to get copyright permission is certainly good way. I think so too. But, in this case, they already say "It can be use by CCBY" on YouTube channel. Despite they already gave permission to us, why I have to send email to them to get permission to use their works? When I upload the files, I certainly attached Template:YouTube CC-BY and links for their videos that licensed CC BY. And I have discussed already such a problem in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Natsuiro Matsuri.png. But you suddenly deleted the pictures and neglect such a things. I know my English skill is very poor, but I cannot help expressing dissent to your opinion.--赤座 (talk) 15:55, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works. Are you absolutely sure that everybody who place something on Flickr or YouTube under Creative Commons licenses understand that? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

If we follow your logic, we cannot use all works uploaded on YouTube or Flickr because the creator may not understand about Creative Commons licenses. And in this case, the creator of the video is belongs to the same company of the subject of the picture. Despite they are belongs to same company and they create the video due to their job, why do you think that they does not accept to use their works each other? In addition, I have an evidence to use the work that has been freely licensed for reuse because they indicate so on their YouTube page. I never reuse works without permission. By the way, User:Abzeronow restored File:Sakuramiko2.png because he estimated "Creation of the YouTube channel, which is freely licensed.". It is the part of pictures that you deleted few days ago.--赤座 (talk) 02:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

It's reasonable to do not accept blindly everything what is written on Internet. Same applies to media under Creative Commons licenses uploaded on Commons or other sites. In this particular case it's necessary to find out was particular employee authorized by company to release something or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Prepending with VFC

Hello, remember to add an enter click after the template when prepending with VFC so to not mess up the summary header, Special:Diff/761907621 :) Happy editing!Jonteemil (talk) 03:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll try my best. However, there should be much better solution: MediaWiki talk:Gadget-VisualFileChange.js ([Feature request] Support for wrong license section). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Perfect, I do agree but until then we'll just have to remember to add the \n. Jonteemil (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

The photo you say is copyrighted is from a chat of mine with an artist, no one else in the world has it, only me on my phone, so it does not infringe copyright

You told me that any doubt I should speak to you, well my doubt is because you give me a copyright notice for an image that is from an instagram chat of mine with another person?????? what does that have copyright? I asked an author of a drawing if I could upload it as a photo in the vegeta article on wikipedia and he said yes and you say that this image violates copyright, when only I in the whole world has that chat image in his iphone?????? what's up friend? Why do you do that so unfairly, you invent that I stole my image from another side and that I infringed copyright laws when the image is from a chat of mine with another person asking for authorization for the aforementioned related to a Wikipedia article, instead of giving me this useful link https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team which is to ask for permission, you invent me to copy the photo that is on my cell phone and that no one else has because it is my instagram chat , with that link that I sent you, you have to ask for permission and not by chat, instead of telling me that you threaten to ban me, you could remove that unfair threat and help people with the link that I gave you since that is useful not to walk threatening people for false things like that they infringed copyright by putting a photo of a chat with an artist asking for authorization to upload a drawing of him for an article on wikipedia GokuJuan (talk) 22:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

https://imageshack.com/i/poGHdFWwp This is the image, I had to upload it there so you can see it again, I don't know why you say it has copyright? Where did you see her????? And the other images that I uploaded did not have copyrights either, only that in the Spanish Wikipedia they explained to me that a special permission is needed to put them and in the English Wikipedia they did not, that is why they deleted them, in no case did they have copyright GokuJuan (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

This is the image: https://imageshack.com/i/poGHdFWwp, I had to upload it there so you can see it again, I don't know why you say it has copyright? Where did you see her????? And the other images that I uploaded were not copyrighted either, only that on the Spanish Wikipedia they explained to me that special permission is needed to put them in an article and on the English Wikipedia they were not, that's why they deleted them, in no case did they have copyright GokuJuan (talk) 22:45, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Derivative works carefully. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I already read it and it does not say that if you take a screenshot with your phone in a chat with another person, your image is magically a screenshot of another screenshot that does not exist on the internet, you invented that

In summary: you cannot trace someone else's copyrighted creative drawing and upload that tracing to Commons under a new, free license because a tracing is a copy without new creative content

That text is the one that appears in commons, in the link that you sent me and if you look for the photo of the chat it does not exist on the internet, therefore it is something 100% original to me, I am the author, stop making excuses for why you deleted me the photo unfairly without any justification, just because it occurred to you to say that it was a copy and now without it existing anywhere other than on my phone GokuJuan (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

This particular screenshot is Commons:Derivative work from anime/manga/comics. I'm strongly advice you to read copyrights law of your country and learn Commons rules. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Obviously the anime image appears in the capture, but both in the name of the capture and in the description of the image, it writes that the image was a test which is a chat with the author of the drawing to be able to upload the image to wikipedia, in summary that image was the proof with the permission of the suto to be able to upload the drawing of him as a photo of oerdil of an article, but since you don't know Spanish you could not realize that, neither the content of the chat nor the end of the image which was to obtain permission from a library to upload the drawing to wikipedia (maybe even with what I explained to you just because the small image appeared in the capture, that is still a reason for copyright so I understand you if it is So) GokuJuan (talk) 02:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Looks like you still do not comprehend that Commons:Derivative work means. Anime/manga/comics is not small part of this particular screenshot. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

File:ML-KNIL 2-VLG-V Logo.png

Hi there,

You have left a message on my personal talks page about the file i have uploaded onto commons. This file is a derivative work indeed, made by me. The original painting on the plane is in dutch public domain tho. Works created by a person for a company (in this case the Dutch East Indies Airforce, that dissovled in 1950 btw) are becoming public domain 70 years after it's creation. You can read this in this (on the official dutch website about copyrights) pdf document https://www.auteursrechten.nl/files/auteursrechten/2019-08/Vuistregels%20voor%20het%20vinden%20van%20gebruiksvoorwaarden.pdf under "WANNEER IS HET WERK PUBLIEK DOMEIN?" (when is a work public domain). Here it states that there are 3 ways for a work to become public domain (by Dutch laws). There it states that it becomes public domain, 70 years after passing from the author OR 70 years after publication/creation. The rhino was painted in 1940... so this is 83 years ago. Therefor it is in public domain.

Friendly regards,

Scarafax (talk) 08:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add information about logo. Current file description tells that is created from photo, but logo is matter. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Albert Eduard Stoové.png

This is a photo from my personal collection. Since he's my grandfather. The photo was made by a close friend from my grandfather (told to me by my grandfather himself) so he could give the photo to his, by then, girlfriend. Who became my grandmother. In Dutch law the same rules apply for photo's, 70 years after the creator had passed. However i do not know who made it (by name) and if that person still is alive or has died long ago... proberbly passed since it's a photo from just after the war, but i can't say if it's 70 years or more... so i have no proof for this photo, therefor you can delete it. The other photo from my grandfather, on the same wiki, is in public domain tho. It's from the Dutch Armed Forces, and more than 70 years old... also it is publicly available on the website of the Dutch Armed Forces.

Scarafax (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

If authorship could not be determined, work is treated as anonymous. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-2.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 17:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-3.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-5.jpg

File:Belarus-Minsk-Yakub Kolas Square-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Хаванне апісанняў змен у гісторыі

Вітаю, Яўген. Да мяне звярнуўся чалавек, не вікімедыст, каб прыбраў яго імя з апісанняў некаторых файлаў, у сувязі з магчымасцю пераследу ў рэальным жыцці. З актуальных апісаннях я прыбраў, але ў табліцах версій файлаў яно засталося. Напрыклад як тут, ці можна схаваць ад прагляду гэту ячэйку, як у самой Вікіпедыі адміны могуць рабіць? Дзякуй. -- Maksim L. (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Калі такое можна зрабіць, то адразу просьба яшчэ пра тры файлы, да таго, што вышэй даў спасылку, пра гэты, гэты і гэты. -- Maksim L. (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Дзякуй,Eugene, але бачна ўсё адно. Паглядзіце старонку файла, унізе табліца, у ячэйцы "Тлумачэнне" застаўся змест першай праўкі. Магчыма, трэба схаваць не толькі аўтара і апісанне, але і сам змест праўкі, каб знікла і гэта. Калі і гэта не дапаможа, можа, проста выдаліць і загрузіць нанова? -- Maksim L. (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

А можа і не загружаць нанова, тры апошнія файлы нідзе не выкарыстоўваюцца, якасць нізкая, унікальнасці асабліва не праглядаецца. -- Maksim L. (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Прашу прабачэньня, не заўважыў. Паспрабаваў хаваць запісы ў журнале, але не дапамагло. Выдаліў тры апошнія файлы. Першы трэба будзе загрузіць ізноў, магчыма з лепшай назвай. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko, дзякуй. Загрузіў зноў першы і замяніў на старонках, дзе ён выкарыстоўваўся. -- Maksim L. (talk) 18:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Выдаліў. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Stuart Land.png

I had permission from the artist himself. I have proof in personal conversation. Contact editors before you delete a file! People have put hard work into their efforts and you can jut come along and put copyright violations on peoples photographs. Look at your talk page you do this regularly. I will be reporting you for vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MNeivandt (talk • contribs) 02:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Please ask photographer/copyrights holder to send permission to Commons:VRT (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:VRT/Noticeboard with permissions review and file undeletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Питання до EugeneZelenko

Вітаю шановний колега.

Прошу допомоги з рятування унікальної бази даних в українській Вікіпедії, стаття "Сигарета", глава "4. Сигарети в Україні", розділ "4.5 Внутрішні українські виробники, марки й дизайни сигарет".

1. Я, Потапенко Володимир Дмитрович, провідний тютюновий експерт України, один з відомих світових експертів з ніковілії, власник найбільшої в Україні й однієї з найбільших в світі колекції сигарет й цигарок (40.000+ екземплярів). Моя колекція занесена в Національний Реєстр Рекордів України.

2. Декілька років тому в статті "Сигарета" в главі "Сигарети в Україні" я створив розділ "Внутрішні українські виробники, марки й дизайни сигарет", а в ньому таблицю з переліком всіх українських брендів й марок сигарет - тоді без фото.

3. Останні тижні я зайнявся додаванням в таблицю фото до кожної позиції. Всього таблиця вміщятиме до тисячі фото дизайнів сигаретних пачок, які вироблялися в Україні й на території України з 1945 по 2023 роки.

4. Всі фото різні, переважна більшість фото створені мною особисто сканером або фотоаппаратом, це фото пачок моєї власної колекції, яка зберігається в мене вдома (м. Дніпро). Менша частина фото зроблена на мій запит моїм колегою Яковенко Андрієм (Харків), володарем другої за розміром колекції сигарет в Україні. Ми з ним працюємо спільно під моїм керівництвом й моєю відповідальністю. Мізерна частина фото взяті в Інтернеті з відкритих джерел.--EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

5. Окрім мене ніхто в Україні не може якісно виконати цю роботу. Закінчення заповнення таблиці очікується за 2 тижні, в грудні 2023 року. Після цього будь-яка людина України зможе знайти фото сигарет, які вона палила в дитинстві або палить зараз, відслідкувати розвиток асортименту тютюнової продукції України. Додатково я організую рекламу цієї статті в міжнародних групах колекціонерів сигарет, що призведе до збільшення відвідуваності української Вікіпедії. Наведена інформація стане довідником по темі на багато десятиліть вперед.

6. Вчора я отримав попередження від Adamant1 про можливе вилучення майже всіх завантажених мною й викладених у статтю "Сигарета" тематичних фотографій. Я маю лише початкові знання з редагування Вікіпедії, тому виконую мінімально необхідний обсяг необхідної роботи. Очевидно, я не зробив всі необхідні дії - прошу мене вибачити й підтримати. Скажіть будь ласка: чи існує спосіб врятувати цю унікальну базу даних, й дозволити мені й надалі виставляти тематичні матеріали (фото), з яких я є експертом.

Щиро дякую за відповідь! Potapenkovd (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Извиняюсь, но украинский не знаю настолько, чтобы на нём писать. Фотографии упаковок представляют собой производные работы. Вы можете сохранить те фотографии, где дизайн представляет собой простые геометрические фигуры и текст ({{PD-logo}}) или перешёл в общественное достояние в стране происхождения ( в Европе в основном через 70 лет после смерти автора). Кроме того, можно сохранить логотипы украинских компаний ({{PD-UA-exempt}}). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Дякую за відповідь. Щиро шкода що внутрішні правила не дозволяють Вікіпедії стати саме збіркою знань людства. Potapenkovd (talk) 04:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Некоторые языковые разделы, например на английском и русском, разрешают использование несвободных медиа-файлов, загруженных локально. Но их количество и качество изображений ограничивается. Смотрите статью 21 закона Украины об авторском праве и смежных правах и w:ru:Добросовестное использование (Эквивалент из законодательства США). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Future undeletion request

Hi there! I have worked a bit on this draft about a software, and I notice that you nominated a file of its logo for deletion here due to lack of notability. The draft now has multiple secondary sources covering it in detail, like articles from the Miami Herald and La Nación. I plan to request undeletion if and when the draft is accepted. I have one question; was the logo just text (like this) or not (like this)? This is just to know whether the file would be eligible for {{PD-textlogo}}. ObserveOwl (talk) 21:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

One of files there was logo like in first link. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

FlickypediaBackfillrBot - status check, please?

Hi! I was directed here to ask if you could please take a look at our Bot approval request. We believe we've addressed all of the community feedback now, and we're a bit unclear on how to actually get the Bot approved and active. Can you please help?

Here is the Bot Approval Request: Commons:Bots/Requests/FlickypediaBackfillrBot

Many thanks! Ukglo, flickr.org 🌸 (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done by Krd. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Bot: Removing c:File:Christopher Marquis Headshot.png , deleted by EugeneZelenko

I am trying to figure out how to get a photo of Professor Christopher Marquis added to his Wikipedia page. I had emailed Professor Marquis and asked him to upload a photo of himself on https://commons.wikimedia.org/ that he would release under the commons license as free to use. He did this and notified me of the photo location on commons.wikimedia.org. I then used the photo in updating his Wikipedia page. This was then removed in short order by you. What would be the proper procedure in order to be able to use a photo that is owned with full rights by Professor Marquis? Is there some release statement that is needed by the rights holder to attest ownership of the photo? SwikityWikity (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Photo does not look like selfie, so does Christopher Marquis own copyrights? This matter should be investigated first and than you could ask for permission from copyrights holder. See also Commons:VRT and Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes, Christopher Marquis owns the copyright to that image. I will email and ask him to fill out and send the email template you provided. Thanks. SwikityWikity (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)