User talk:Mosbatho

Archives 2020 2021 2022 Recent discussions

Regarding the deletion of my image

the screenshot is being used for the purpose of critical commentary or to illustrate a point being made in the article. Additionally, the use of the screenshot is not for commercial purposes and is not likely to negatively impact the market for the music video. Finally, the use of the screenshot is limited and does not constitute a significant portion of the music video.

An Example would be Aiyana Jones.jpg Elinasnow (talk) 13:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply. Unfortunately, uploading this image violates the rules and legal foundations of Commons. Commons has clear rules regarding copyright, which do not cover your above statements. Please read COM:L for further information. Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 14:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mosbatho,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

File:GOES-T Atlas V Arrives by ship (51715924106).jpg

 

Pay attention to licensing

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:GOES-T Atlas V Arrives by ship (51715924106).jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

The reason given by the user who added this tag is: File by United Launch Alliance

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, the image is in the public domain. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi. In this case, {{PD-NASA}} doesn't apply as it's not a file created by NASA. Please use this license only for files created by NASA. Huntster corrected the license. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Actually I thought, this would be some NASA subdivision. But, the image is in the public domain, simple the tag I used was not the one that fitted properly. There has never been any copyright violation with this image. So your copyvio tag was incorrect. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 06:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Mosbatho,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 15:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke für's Bescheidgeben! Beste Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please help

Dear Mosbatho, Will you be so kind to help in improving a Category:Igor Janev. There are two photos' at Wikimedia Commons: [File:Makedonska opozicija Igor Janev.jpg] and [File:Makedonska opozicija.jpg]. He is a key person at Institute for political science in Belgrade. See also Igor Janev - Wikidata.[1]. Sincerely yours. ВАЊА (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi PВАЊА (PВАЊА), I have added some categories and brought the category to Commons standards. Are you fine with that? Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Dear Mosbatho, thank you very much for your help. Best regards, ВАЊА (talk) 20:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

My pleasure. Just ask me for help if need it for your future projects here! Kindest regards, Mosbatho (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Al-Hashemi-II (ship).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpine farmhouse reconstructed in Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
SP-10 (Semi-submersible).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Al-Hashemi-II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

I really appreciate you doing the image moves of Dwyer Park. Thanks! - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 14:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, no problem! With pleasure again! Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 14:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-25RBS, Riga Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC) Thank you! I have recently made minor changes regarding the image quality. Just small things. --Mosbatho 22:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evangelische Kirche (Ebenholz) - interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: With corrected perspective, the picture would certainly be even more valuable. I am surprised that sometimes the correction is requested, other times not. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 08:55, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment In this case it can be rewarding, because it is a bird's eye view. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A541 Birkholm (ship, 2007).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kasane Airport, Botswana (52541632848).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

 Comment This file got undeleted by User:Yann shortly afterwards (thanks for that), see here. --Mosbatho (talk) 18:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Photo upload

Hello, how can I use photo uploads of you? Are downloads for free? 0r how much is it? Ok? 69.50.94.71 18:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you won't have to give me money! The CC licenses are free. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Photo use

Hello Sirs, we would like to use this photo (File:Bulgarian 9K714 Oka, NMMH.jpg) for a magazine report publication. Do you agree?

Regards, Jim Harlswood 154.62.182.10 14:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, of course you can use it, just credit © Mosbatho / CC BY 4.0 for instance. Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yuanshan Great Hotel (Grand Hotel) in Taipei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-21US, Riga Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tofaş Şahin - left front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 14:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propeller of the USS Blessman at the New Taipei City Weapon Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Palms Beach Hotel & Spa in Kuwait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MiG-23M, Riga Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:18, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

File:5-inch 38-caliber gun of ROCS Navy vessel Kwei Yang.jpg

This gun is quite common and widely spread and we have many images of it. can you please create a certain category with the location of it? 37.187.244.122 05:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

This gun turret is part of the New Taipei City Weapon Park exposition; I plan the create this category. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 19:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo Mosbatho,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Lieber thomas, danke für's Benachrichtigen! Natürlich werde ich wieder das ein oder andere beitragen zu diesem Wettbewerb! Viele Grüße, Mosbatho (talk) 18:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fullon Hotel Danshuei Fishermen's Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zlín Z-37A - OK-ZKC, Riga Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just ok --Poco a poco 02:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arvydas Ališanka - Medžio viduje - in the wood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective. --多多123 21:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Ok. But doing more on that does not make sense. --Mosbatho 21:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 22:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fire station of the voluntary fire department Pürgg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platforms of Stainach-Irdning station in Styria, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hurghada Museum building in September 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großenhain - Relief an einem Wohnhaus - Gabelsbergerstraße 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mühlberg (Elbe) - Bahnhofstraße 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Böttgersäule in Pavlův Studenec (CZ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Tagooty 01:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riesa - Lenindenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 09:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Irdning mit Friedhofskapelle, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Beautiful composition although it is a cemetery. --Hillopo2018 09:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in/contribute to a photo contest

English

Dear Mosbatho,

We’re excited to share with you our first-ever art and photo contest for this year’s #VisibleWikiWomen, on Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports!

We’re inviting submissions of photos, illustrations, and other forms of art depicting womxn and non-binary people in sports — as athletes, fans, cheerleaders, referees, journalists, and much more. Our #VisibleWikiWomxn contest celebrates the bodies of womxn in sports by centering their voices, images, stories, and experiences in all their diversity, plurality, and glory.

You can find all the information on our landing page: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports

Spanish

Hola Mosbatho,

Queremos invitarte a participar de nuestro primer concurso de arte y fotografía "Cuerpos plurales en el deporte" en el marco de la campaña #VisibleWikiWomen de este año.

Estamos convocando a presentar fotos, ilustraciones y otras formas de arte que representen a mujeres y personas no binarias en el deporte - atletas, personas aficionadas, animadoras, árbitras, periodistas y personas ligadas al deporte en todos los aspectos. Nuestro concurso #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra los cuerpos de las mujeres en el deporte centrándose en sus voces, imágenes, historias y experiencias en toda su diversidad, pluralidad y gloria.

Puedes encontrar toda la información en la página del concurso.

Portuguese

Olá Mosbatho,

Ficamos felizes em convidar você a participar de nossa primeira Wiki-competição de arte e fotografia, como parte da campanha #VisibleWikiWomen deste ano, sobre "Corpos plurais no esporte"!

Estamos recebendo fotos, ilustrações, e outras formas de arte que retratem mulheres e pessoas não-binárias nos esportes — como atletas, torcedoras, juízas, jornalistas, e muito mais. Nossa competição #VisibleWikiWomxn celebra os corpors de mulheres e pessoas não-binárias e coloca ao centro suas vozes, imagens, histórias, e experiências em toda sua pluralidade e glória.

Você pode encontrar todas as informações necessárias em nossa página: Unpacking Body Plurality in Sports.

Sunshine Fionah Komusana (talk) 15:16, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Sunshine! Wow! Cool! Thank you for inviting me! I will see what i have in my photo stocks. Kindest regards, Mosbatho (talk) 21:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruzeiro do Canal in São Roque do Pico in 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 05:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weatherford International nodding donkey pump, Bahrain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Riveuse industrielle

Bonjour, Je suis passionné de machines industrielles et je leur donne une seconde vie dans un atelier français. Serait-il possible de connaître l emplacement de la riveuse que vous avez photographiée. Elle semble être abandonnée dans la cour d'une entreprise et pourrait retrouver un second souffle dsi son propriétaire est prêt à la vendre. Merci pour votre réponse. Cordialement 2A02:8440:310D:7FB0:A889:DA1A:ABDD:84C4 14:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Mon cher inconnu ! Je te souhaite un joyeux Noël et de bonnes fêtes de fin d'année ! J'ai photographié la riveteuse à Lauchhammer-Ost. La position exacte se trouve ici [2]. Elle se trouve sur le site de l'entreprise TAKRAF de RDA. L'usine est encore en activité dans une certaine mesure. Faites-moi savoir si vous avez pu acheter cette machine. Meilleures salutations ! Mosbatho (talk) 22:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Merci pour la rapidité et la précision de ta réponse.

Si le propriétaire de la riveuse est d'accord pour me la céder, tu en seras informé.

je te souhaite également de très joyeuses fêtes.

Au plaisir de te lire,

Sébastien 2A02:8440:3118:E731:34B2:7802:2AD7:DB6E 12:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Salut Sébastien, je te souhaite bonne chance pour l'acquisition de cette machine. Si tu l'as achetée, télécharge une photo sur Commons. Mosbatho (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patrouillenboot Barend Biesheuvel in Scheveningen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motrice 133 - tramways unifiés de Liège et extensions (TULE).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Howitzer 2A18 - tow linkage under the muzzle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Damayantidwi 07:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SA226-AT Merlin IVA at the Royal Thai Air Force Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Rewriting history?

At [3] something went wrong. The picture dates from 2012, but the company name you are using is from 2023. User:Mpns might have gotten the dates wrong. Please revert it. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

User:Mpns brought decisive reasons for that file move. Contact them for figuring this out. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

At 2012, the Date the picture was taken, the company was namend "DB Netz AG". At 2023-12-28 this Company has been officially renamed from "DB Netz AG" to "DB InfraGO AG". So today it's a picture from a building of DB InfraGO AG. mfG - Martin ^{(Rede gerne mit mir)} 20:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

So, I think, the best would be to bring this up in the file description. So, anybody whi is interentes shall have this info. I would highly appreciate this! Thanks in advance! --Mosbatho (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

@@Mosbatho They were pinged by my message, but the change you made (and the argument that was made), doesn't qualify for an "obvious error". You may loose file renaming rights if you don't apply our policy correctly. Please revert this change. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I am no DB expert, the file move was brought up by User:Mpns. Get in contact with them and if a consensus is found, I will act. Mosbatho (talk) 20:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Please re-read the policy and explain to me how you understood that this was an "obvious error". It's for the file mover to make sure that the criteria are met. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The additional Reason 'Reason: Renaming DB Netz AG to DB InfraGO AG at Dec. 2023' was given at renaming request. Because the company "DB Netz AG" doesn't exist anymore and this building today is used by "DB InfraGO AG" the filename was wrong. mfG - Martin ^{(Rede gerne mit mir)} 20:55, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

That's information you can put in the Wikipedia article. The Commons file still shows the building 10 years ago. Enhancing999 (talk) 20:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

The picture shows a building of DB InfraGO AG and NOT from DB Netz AG (cause DB Netz AG doesn't exist anymore) right now. So the old filename was an obvious error! mfG - Martin ^{(Rede gerne mit mir)} 21:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Let's hear Mosbatho's explanation. Afterall, it's their file renaming rights at stake. It seems to me, it might just have slipped through their diligent review. Enhancing999 (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

So, Enhancing999, why do you think martin's argument is incorrect? That's the point. Mosbatho (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

If you look at the samples for "obvious errors", it just matches none of them. Also, there is no way the uploader could have guessed the name ten years back, so it's not really an "error" at all.

Besides, if you can't explain why it's an "obvious error" yourself, then it can't be obvious. Please fix this, so we can move on and I don't have to bring it up elsewhere. Enhancing999 (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

are there any personal animosities here between you and martin that i have fallen into? Your rather aggressive way of approaching this circumstance allows a neutral observer to judge it that way. In short: your argument is "date", martin's is that the name of the company has changed. According to Google Maps, the building today looks like the photo in question. This reinforces martin's argument, who requested that the file be moved. He, as a very experienced user in the railroad sector, repeatedly confirmed why he thought the move made sense. Once again, I urge you to focus less on confrontation and more on construction. I am confident that an amicable agreement can be reached, but it will have to be between the two of you. Thank you for your cooperation. Mosbatho (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't think this concerns Martin at all. I just noticed that one of your renames when wrong and asked you to fix it. You commented on the rename several times here, but made no effort to fix or explain it. I find this highly concerning. Please consider reviewing the way you apply our file renaming policy. If you think it should be changed, you can open a discussion about it. Enhancing999 (talk) 00:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

I find this highly concerning that you keep ignoring martins arguments. You don't seem to take martin's arguments seriously and don't really want to get in touch with him about this. Please, find a solution with them. Afterwards, I will act accordingly. --Mosbatho (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

His argument was in your file rename log (echoed across all Wikimedia sites). There is nothing new that was said above.

Maybe it helps you when I repeat what is on the interface for renames for "(3)": "To correct obvious errors in filenames, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms."

Old:

File:Ayres Rock 3.png

File:Van Gogh portrait 1787.jpg

File:Unknown insect 02.jpg

New:

File:Ayers Rock 3.png

File:Van Gogh portrait 1887.jpg

File:Hogna radiata 02.jpg

I let you think about it for a few days and fix it. Otherwise I will have to ask an admin to look into it. Enhancing999 (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, "His argument" is the thing you do not like. That triggers you - unfortunatley. Your newest comment should be a threat or what? I i recommend that you cool down a bit. I won't answer any more until martin comments. You know this? --Mosbatho (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Ich verlasse nun die Sprache, die für mich eine Fremdsprache darstellt und gebe einen letzten Kommentar:

Mein Umbenennungsantrag hatte das Ziel, die Wikipedia als Gesamtes zu verbessern. Da es sich hier nach der und durch die Umbenennung des Unternehmens um ein "misidentified object" gemäß den Vorgaben handelt, da es sich nicht (mehr) ein Gebäude der DB Netz AG ist, ist wohl offensichtlich.

Ich sehe hier auch keine sachlichen Gründe, gegen die Umbenennung zu sein.

@Mosbatho: Von einem persönlichem Streit zwischen @Enhancing999 und mir ist mir nichts bekannt - dies kann somit auch kein Grund für seine Einlassungen sein (nur, um ein eventuell hier vorliegendes Missverständnis aufzuklären).

Mit ist es letztendlich aber auch egal, ob der Dateiname zum Gebäude passt oder nicht. Für diese Unterhaltung hier ist mir jede weitere Zeit zu schade. mfG - Martin ^{(Rede gerne mit mir)} 11:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Can you revert this now? I trust you had time to think this over. Enhancing999 (talk) 15:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Wie du sicherlich feststellen konntest, wurden beide Argumente dargelegt. Die des Antragstellers und deine - ein Konsens wurde m.E. gefunden. Eine ausführliche Diskussion darüber fand statt. Bitte verzichte in Zukunft darauf, deine Kommentare hier zu posten. Ich empfinde es mittlerweile als harassing. Du weißt, was das ist. Sei konstruktiver. Mit Grüßen, Mosbatho (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anchor of USS Bull on display at the New Taipei City Weapon Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Anchor love. Sharp stuff. --Hillopo2018 11:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anchor ROCS Chung Suo on display at the New Taipei City Weapon Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5-inch 38-caliber gun of ROCS Navy vessel Kwei Yang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bulgarian 9K714 Oka, NMMH.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schleusenanlage mit Betriebsbrücke D-2-75-153-105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schalthaus Am Kraftwerk in Untergriesbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the veticals. --Ermell 22:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Mosbatho 15:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tu-134B, Riga Aviation Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kath. Wallfahrtskirche zum Gegeißelten Heiland (interior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA on the left window --Nikride 20:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC) that is really negligible. --Mosbatho 20:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok, good quality. --Nikride 20:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avenue Schweiklberg 1 in Vilshofen an der Donau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katholische Friedhofskapelle St. Stephan in Pleinting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction --Nikride 20:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC) I have tried but it let it look extremely unnatural. --Mosbatho 20:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)  Support IMO perspective is ok as it is. Quality is good. --Plozessor 05:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Az Zaur (town) on Failaka Island, Kuwait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Do not blame users for "harassing" you if you do not agree with their opinion

Do not call it harassment if you do not agree with the interpretation of policies by other users. Accusing others to harass you without basis could be considered as harassment by you. Please respect this warning. GPSLeo (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I do respect other people's opinion very well! The way how issues are discussed is decisive and this can be considered as harassment aside one`s opinion. --Msb (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Mosbatho (remove file rename right). This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

─ Aafī (talk) 13:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for having been informed about this. I wonder why you have to do so. Regards, Msb (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)